Different Exit Effects between a Combined Riser with Variable Exit Constraints and a Conventional Riser with Weak Exit Constraints

Article Preview

Abstract:

A large-scale cold model experimental setup of combined riser with variable constraint exit (CRVCE) was established. The axial and radial distributions of solids holdup and particle velocity, under different operating conditions, were investigated experimentally, and the results were compared with conventional riser (CR). Experimental results showed that, the exit restrictive effect of combined riser with variable constraint exit was weak when particle circulation flux and static bed height in upper fluidized bed were lower, while it turned to be strong when superficial gas velocity and static bed height in upper fluidized bed were higher. Under the same conditions, averaged cross-sectional solids holdup of CRVCE was characterized by C type distribution when article circulation flux was higher, while that of CR with weak constraint exit was characterized by linear distribution. In axial direction, averaged cross-sectional particle velocity of CRVCE changed in order: acceleration-constant-decrease velocity, while that of CR changed in another: acceleration-constant velocity. The maximum of local solids holdup value of CRVCE appeared at the dimensionless radius position r/R=0.7, while that of CR appeared in the wall region. Their local particle velocities were similar in the core region, while local particle velocity of CRVCE was lower than that of CR in the annular region.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 550-553)

Pages:

529-533

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y.H. Xu, J.S. Zhang, and J. Long: Petroleum Processing and Petrochemicals, Vol. 32(8) (2001), 1-5 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] C. Xu, and Z.F. Yuan: Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China), Vol. 59(9) (2004), 1459-1468 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] J. Yang, X.D. Xie, and Z. Cai: China Foreign Energy, Vol. 11(3) (2006), 54-60 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] R. Evgeny, K. Haim: Powder Technology, Vol. 207(1-3) (2011): 119-133.

Google Scholar

[5] D.W. Wang, C.X. Lu, and C.Y. Yan: Particuology, Vol. 7 (1) (2009): 19-25.

Google Scholar

[6] Y.L. Yang, Y. Jin, Z.Q. Yu, and Z.W. Wang: Chemical Reaction Engineering and Technology, Vol. 6(4) (1990): 30-35.

Google Scholar

[7] X.B. Qi: Study on gas-solid dynamics in the riser coupled with fluidized bed. Dissertation, Sichuan University, Chengdu (2003) (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] A.S. Issangya, D. Bai, H.T. Bi, K.S. Lim, J. Zhu, J.R. Grace: Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 54(1999): 5451-5460.

DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(99)00283-3

Google Scholar

[9] W.X. Huang, B. Yi, Y. Yang, and Y.L. Pan: Journal of Sichuan University (Engineering Science Section), Vol. 32(6) (2000), 38-41(in Chinese).

Google Scholar