Biotransformation from Isoeugenol to Vanillin by Immobilized Bacillus fusiformis CGMCC1347 Cells

Article Preview

Abstract:

A novel strain, Bacillus fusiformis CGMCC1347, was utilized successfully to transform isoeugenol to vanillin and the product inhibition could be well avoided by using immobilized cells in the isoeugenol/aqueous biphasic system. The Bacillus fusiformis CGMCC1347 cells were entrapped into sodium alginate under conditions of 2.5% sodium alginate, 10% cells and 0.1 mol l-1 CaCl2. The optimum pH for free cells and immobilized cells were 4.0 and 3.5, respectively, and the optimum reaction temperature for both free and immobilized cells was 37 °C. The pH stabilities of free cells and immobilized cells were good at all investigated pH levels. For thermal stability, free cells were stable at 50°C60°C and the immobilized cells were stable at 50°C 80°C. The half-life of the immobilized cells was more than 25 d, comparing with less than 14 d for the free cells at 4°C.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 554-556)

Pages:

1507-1510

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H Priefert, J Babenhorst, A Steinbchel: Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Vol 56 (2001), pp.296-314.

Google Scholar

[2] JW Nicholas, N Arjan, BF Craig, et al: Curr. Opin. Biotech. Vol 11 (2000), pp.490-96.

Google Scholar

[3] D Druaux, GJ Mangeot: Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. Vol 68 (1997), pp.214-18.

Google Scholar

[4] R León, P Fernandes, HM Pinheiro, et al: Enzyme Microb. Technol. Vol 23 (1998), pp.483-500.

Google Scholar

[5] F Molinari, R Gandolfi, F Aragozzini, et al: Enzyme Microb. Technol. Vol 25 (1999), pp.729-35.

Google Scholar

[6] Y Li, Z Sun, L Zhao, et al: Appl Biochem Biotechnol, Vol 125 (1) (2005), pp.1-10.

Google Scholar

[7] D Hua, C Ma, S Lin et al: J. Biotech, Vol 130 (4) (2007), pp.463-470.

Google Scholar

[8] R Seshadri, A Lamm, A Khare, et al: Enzyme Microb. Technol. Vol 43(7) (2008), pp.486-494.

Google Scholar

[9] Y Zhang, P Xu,S Han, et al: Appl Microb Biotechnol, Vol 73 (4) (2006), pp.771-779.

Google Scholar

[10] M Yamada, Y Okada, T Yoshida, et al: Archives of Microbiology, Vol 187(6) (2007), pp.511-517.

Google Scholar

[11] M Yamada, Y Okada, T Yoshida, et al: Biotech. Lett, Vol 30(4) (2008), pp.665-670.

Google Scholar

[12] M Ashengroph, I Nahvi, H Zarkesh-Esfahani, et al: Current Microbiology, 2010.

Google Scholar

[13] L Zhao, Z Sun, P Zheng, et al: Process Biochem. Vol 41(7) (2006), pp.1673-76.

Google Scholar

[14] L Zhao, Z Sun, P Zheng, et al: Biotech. Lett. Vol 27(2005), pp.1505-09.

Google Scholar

[15] Z Sun, P Zheng, L Zhao: Chinese Patent, 200510064494.0 (2005).

Google Scholar

[16] Y Li, Z Sun, P Zheng: Chromatographia. Vol 60 (2004), pp.709-13.

Google Scholar