Kinetic Spectrophotometric Method for the Determination of Selenium (IV) by its Catalytic Effect on the Reduction of Arsenazo III with Sodium Hypophosphite in Micellar Media

Article Preview

Abstract:

A simple and sensitive kinetic spectrophotometric method for the determination of trace selenium (IV) is described, based on its catalytic effect on the reduction arsenazo III (AsA III) with sodium hypophosphite (NaH2PO2) in a solution of 0.02 mol/L sulfuric acid and in the presence of cationic micellar media. The reaction rate is monitored spectrophotometrically by measuring the decrease in absorbance of AsA III at 550 nm with a fixed-time method. The decrease in the absorbance of AsA III is proportional to the concentration of Se(IV) in the range 0.16–1.0 µg/L after a fixed time of 4–10 min from the initiation of the reaction. The limit of detection is 0.049 µg/L Se(IV). The influence of th e factors such as acidity, concentration of reactants, type and concentration of surfactants, reactive time, temperature and co-existing ions on the reaction is discussed. The optimum reaction conditions of reaction are established and some kinetic parameters are determined; the apparent activation energy of catalytic reaction is 59.51 kJ/mol. The relative standard deviation for eleven replicate determination of 0.02, and 0.01µg/25mL Se(IV) was 2.0 % and 2.4 %, respectively. Combined with sulphydryl dextrane gel (SDG) separation and enriching, the method has been successfully applied to the determination of Se (IV) in foodstuff and human hair samples with the relative standard deviation of 2.1 %–5.8 % and the recovery of 97.0 %–103.3 %, the results are in good agreement with those provided by ICP-AES method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 554-556)

Pages:

926-933

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 19th ed. (American Public Health Association Press, Washington, DC 1995).

Google Scholar

[2] E.V. Shlyapunova, V.P. Sergeeva and G.M. Sergeev: Journal of Analytical Chemistry Vol. 63 (2008): p.219

Google Scholar

[3] S. Kamlesh, K.P. Devesh: Food Chemistry Vol. 124 (2011), p.1673

Google Scholar

[4] A.O. da S. Marcelo da S. and A. Z. A: Marco. Microchimica Acta Vol. 176 (2012), p.131

Google Scholar

[5] A. Mehdi and A. Alireza: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 168 (2009), p.542

Google Scholar

[6] E. Chajduk, H. Polkowska-Motrenko and  R.S. Dybczyński: Accreditation and Quality Assurance: Journal for Quality, Comparability and Reliability in Chemical Measurement Vol. 13 (2008), p.443

DOI: 10.1007/s00769-008-0377-7

Google Scholar

[7] M. Dzierzgowska, K. Pyrzyñska and E. Poboży: Journal of Chromatography A  Vol. 984 (2003), p.291

DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01846-0

Google Scholar

[8] J.L. Gómez-Ariza, J.A. Pozas and I. Giráldez: Talanta Vol. 49 (1999), p.285

Google Scholar

[9] M. Darja, O. Jože and S. Vekoslava: Food Chemistry Vol. 107 (2008), p.75

Google Scholar

[10] P. Masson, D. Orignac and T. Prunet: Analytica Chimica Acta Vol. 545 (2005), p.79

Google Scholar

[11] M.A. Al-Khairia: Arabian Journal of Chemistry Vol. 2 (2009), p.95

Google Scholar

[12] Z.R. Zhou, Q. Wang, S.Y. Zhang, J.W. Zhang, Y.L. Zhang and Z.W. Su: Chinese journal of Food Science Vol. 29 (2008): p.292

Google Scholar

[13] C. Vimlesh and P. Surendra: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol.165(2009), p.780

Google Scholar

[14] G. Ramazan, İ.U. Halil, A. Mehmet and B. Pinar: Rare Metals Vol. 30 (2011), p.477

Google Scholar

[15] A. Pedraza, M.D. Sicilia, S. Rubio and D. Pérez-Bendito: Anal. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Vol. 389 (2007), p. (2097)

Google Scholar