Grinding Performance Evaluation of the Developed Chemo-Mechanical Grinding (CMG) Tools for Sapphire Substrate

Zhi Gang Dong; Shang Gao; P. Zhou; Ren Ke Kang; Dong Ming Guo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.565.105

Paper Titles

Optimal Design of the Grinding Parameter on Zr-4 Cladding Tubes Abrasive Belt Grinding Based on BP and GA
p.82

Experimental Investigation on Grinding Surface Condition of 9Mn2V under Different Tempering Processes
p.88

Grinding Force in Creep Feed Grinding of Titanium Alloy with Monolayer Brazed CBN Wheels
p.94

Accurate Extraction of Normal Residual Error for Compensation Grinding
p.100

Grinding Performance Evaluation of the Developed Chemo-Mechanical Grinding (CMG) Tools for Sapphire Substrate
p.105

A Grinding Protocol for the Fabrication of Micro/Meso Aspheric Moulds for Optic Applications
p.111

Industrial Application of the MCG (Minimum Coolant Grinding) Technology
p.117

The Characteristics of High-Speed Cylindrical Grinding of Silicon Carbide and its Influence on the Surface Layer
p.123

An Experimental Investigation of Ultrasonic Assisted Grinding in DOE Approach
p.129

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 565Grinding Performance Evaluation of the Developed...

Grinding Performance Evaluation of the Developed Chemo-Mechanical Grinding (CMG) Tools for Sapphire Substrate

Abstract:

In order to improve the surface quality of sapphire substrates ground by diamond wheel, the chemo-mechanical grinding (CMG) tools for sapphire grinding was investigated in this paper. According to the processing principle of CMG, three CMG tools with different abrasives of SiO2, Fe2O3 and MgO were developed respectively. The compositions of the CMG tools were designed and optimized based on the physicochemical characteristics of sapphire. The grinding experiments were performed with the developed CMG tools and the grinding performance of three kind of tools were evaluated by comparing the surface roughness and the MRR of sapphire. The experiment results show that the grinding performance of SiO2 CMG tool was worst. The surface roughness and MRR corresponding to SiO2 CMG tool were all significantly poorer than Fe2O3 and MgO CMG tools. The highest MRR could be obtained by Fe2O3 CMG tool, but the best surface quality was obtained by MgO CMG tool.