Mechanics Behavior Analysis of K Type Flashboard Node of Transmission Tower in Civil Engineering

Article Preview

Abstract:

On the UHV transmission steel tube tower, the K type flashboard node is the more common node, the destruction of the node easily leads to the destruction of the entire transmission tower. Through ANSYS software to simulate the U type and the groove type flashboard node establishs a solid model. using the arc-length method for both flashboard node does numerical analysis. Obtained U type flashboard node bearing capacity is greater . U type flashboard node belongs to the branch pipe local buckling failure mode , while the groove flashboard node belongs to the support tube, flashboard and motherboard simultaneous buckling failure mode. Recommended that we should , when bearing capacity is a greater, prior to the use of U type flashboard node in the design and engineering .

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

196-199

Citation:

Online since:

September 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Minsheng key technologies in the the Yamen span steel tower design [J]. Guangdong Power Transmission Technology, 2010, 1.

Google Scholar

[2] Wang Xinmin. Ansys Engineering Numerical Analysis [M]. Beijing: People's Communications Press, 2007. 10.

Google Scholar

[3] People's Republic of China State Economic and Trade Commission. DL / T 5154-2002, overhead power transmission line tower structural design provisions of the [S]. Beijing: China Electric Power Press, (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] Ding Yun Sun JOINTS several design issues of tube structure [J]. Spatial structure, 2002, 8 (2) : 56-64.

Google Scholar

[5] Kosteski N, Packer J A. A Finite Element Method Based Yield Load Determination Procedure for Hollow Structural Section Connections [ J ] . Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2003, 59: 453-471.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(02)00066-4

Google Scholar

[6] Wang Hu. Width to thickness ratio of strut stable strength reduction [J]. ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM, 2008, 24 (2) : 7-30.

Google Scholar