Construction Quality Supervision Game Analysis and Collusion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Driven by benefit and asymmetrical information, collusion behaviors occur between Supervisors and construction enterprises in the process of construction quality supervision. By utilizing the game theory, the tripartite gambling behaviors of the real state development, the quality supervisor and the construction enterprise were analyzed. Based on the three-hierarchy organization analysis, a “request—supervision ~ proxy” model was constructed to inspect collusion and incentive mechanism. Related proposals were put forward.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

723-728

Citation:

Online since:

September 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Laurent Linnemer, Price and advertising as signals of quality when some consumers are informed, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 20, Issue 7, September 2002, Pages 931–947.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7187(01)00081-9

Google Scholar

[2] Steven R. Grenadier† Neng Wang, Investment Timing, Agency and Information.

Google Scholar

[3] Ren Yulong, Yang Feifei, game-based signal analysis of environmental regulatory mechanism of conspiracy - to China's power industry, environmental monitoring, Technology Management Research, 2010, 7: 227-229(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Philip Jones, John Hudson, Signalling product quality: When is price relevant? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 30, Issue 2, August 1996, Pages 257–266.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00883-9

Google Scholar

[5] Mr Yeung Hung, Wang Ying Luo, owners of major infrastructure projects and other parties conspired Game Analysis [J]. Engineering and Engineering Management, 2006, 2: 126-129(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[6] Guo Nanyun, conspiracy construction field dynamics and governance [J]. Social scientists, 2008, 2: 114-117(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Louis Thomas, Scott Shane, Keith Weigelt, An empirical examination of advertising as a signal of product quality. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 37, Issue 4, 30 December 1998, Pages 415–430.

DOI: 10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00118-8

Google Scholar

[8] Juergen Noll, Comparing qualitysignals as tools of consumer protection: are warranties always better than advertisements to promote higher product quality? International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 24, Issue 2, June 2004, Pages 227–239.

DOI: 10.1016/j.irle.2004.08.007

Google Scholar

[9] Zhang Weiying. Game Theory and Information Economics [S]. First edition, Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House,2004,11 (3): 191(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] SCOTT E. ATKINSON, DONALD H. A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Alternative Air Quality Control Strategies, ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT 1, (1974).

Google Scholar