Schlieren and PLIF Measurements of Liquid Fuel Injection in Mach 2 Supersonic Crossflow

Article Preview

Abstract:

Structures of liquid-fuel injection in supersonic crossflow is studied experimentally. Schemes of flush-wall injector and aviation kerosene are selected. The conditions of the supersonic freestream are kept constant (total pressure is 0.5MPa, total temperature is 500K and Mach number is 2) and the diameter of the injector is fixed as 0.5mm, while seven scenarios of injection angle and three scenarios of injection driven pressure are discussed. Both methods of schlieren and planar laser induced fluorescence (PLIF) techniques are implemented to obtain the visual images of the liquid-fuel injection. The penetration height of fuel is analyzed quantitatively with the aid of Photoshop and Origin. The results serve not only the future computational simulation but also combined scheme of flush-wall injector and other combustor configurations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

701-705

Citation:

Online since:

September 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. M. Seiner, S. M. Dash, and D. C. Kenzakowski, Historical Survey on Enhanced Mixing in Scramjet Engines, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2001, p.1273 –1286, doi: 10. 2514/2. 5876.

DOI: 10.2514/2.5876

Google Scholar

[2] D. W. Bogdanoff, Advanced Injection and Mixing Techniques for Scramjet Combustors, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1994, p.183– 190, doi: 10. 2514/3. 23728.

DOI: 10.2514/3.23728

Google Scholar

[3] F. Benoit, S. K. Lele, Numerical Investigation of a Transverse Jet in a Supersonic Crossflow using Large Eddy Simulation, 36th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit, San Francisco, USA, 2006, AIAA 2006-3712.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-3712

Google Scholar

[4] J. Brand, S. Sampath, F. Shum, R. L. Bayt and J. Cohen, Potential Use of Hydrogen In Air Propulsion, AIAA International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Years, Dayton, USA, 2003, AIAA 2003-2879.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2003-2879

Google Scholar

[5] D. C. Maniaci, Relative Performance of a Liquid Hydrogen-Fueled Commercial Transport, 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, USA, 2008, AIAA 2008-152.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-152

Google Scholar

[6] Edwards T. Liquid Fuels and Propellants for Aerospace Propulsion: 1903-2003, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 19, No. 6, 2003, p.1089 –1107, doi: 10. 2514/2. 5876.

DOI: 10.2514/2.6946

Google Scholar

[7] H. Yang, F, Li, and B. G. Sun, Trajectory Analysis of Fuel Injection into Supersonic Cross Flow Based on Schlieren Method, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, Vol. 24, No. 5, 2011, p.550–557, doi: 10. 1016/S1000-9361(11)60064-2.

DOI: 10.1016/s1000-9361(11)60360-9

Google Scholar