Influence of Chemical Conditioning on Electroosmotic Dewatering Behavior for Activated Sludge

Article Preview

Abstract:

Applying electroosmosis to sludge dewatering practically, methods for improving electroosmotic dewatering must be explored. The influence of initial pH, adding Al2 (SO4)3 dose and ash content in sludge on electroosmotic dewatering behavior was investigated. The results show that acid or alkaline environment is unfavorable for electroosmotic dewatering, especially initial pH of sludge closing to the isoelectric point, electroosmotic dewatering behaves worst. With increasing Al2(SO4)3 coagulant-aid dose, the decreasing rate of water content becomes slower gradually during electroosmotic dewatering. Besides, higher ash content in sludge has a better effect on vaccum filtration, but slightly impact on electroosmotic dewatering. When ash content increases to 69.9% from 52.4%, final water content reduces to 64.3% from 78.3% using vaccum filtration, and the decreasing amount of water content by electroosmotic dewatering ranges from 16.5% to 12.3%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 573-574)

Pages:

126-130

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Mihoubi: Desalination Vol. 167 (2004), p.135.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Y. Deng, J. H. Yan, X. D. Li, F. Wang, X. W. Zhu, S. Y. Lu and K. F. Cen: J. Hazard. Mater. Vol. 162 (2009), p.186.

Google Scholar

[3] G. H. Chen and A. S. Mujumdar: Dev. Chem. Eng. Mineral Process. Vol. 10 (2002), p.429.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Curvers, K. C. Maes, H. Saveyn, B. De Baets, S. Miller and P. Van der Meeren: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 62 (2007), p.2267.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.12.085

Google Scholar

[5] X. Y. Yu, S. T. Zhang, H. Xu, X. B. Lu and D. G. Ma: Fresenius Environ. Bull. Vol. 19 (2010), p.93.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Yoshida: Drying Technol. Vol. 11 (1993), p.787.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Citeau, O. Larue, and E. Vorobiev: Water Res. Vol. 45 (2011), p.2167.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Kondoh and M. Hiraoka: 6th world filtration congress, Nagoya 1993, p.765.

Google Scholar

[9] O. Larue, R. J. Wakeman, E. S. Tarleton and E. Vorobiev: Chem. Eng. Sci. Vol. 61 (2006), p.4732.

Google Scholar

[10] APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, Baltimore, MD: American Public Health Association, (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] S. Gopalakrishnan, A. S. Mujumdar and M. E. Weber: Sep. Technol. Vol. 6 (1996), p.197.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Q. Shang: Can. Geotech. J. Vol. 34 (1997), p.627.

Google Scholar