Parameters Analysis of Line Segment Fabrication on Near-Field Photolithography

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper proposes the integral formula of exposure energy density during the movement of work piece to investigate the exposure energy distribution on the photoresist surface. The photoresist was divided into finite nodes to combine the integral formulas of exposure energy density to calculate the relative concentration variation of the photoactive compound (PAC) at each finite node of photoresist interior layer. This paper further combines with Mack’s development model and calculates the average full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of near field photolithography. This study conducted sensitivity analysis to determine how adjusting groups of control parameters influences FWHM and working depth (Hmax). Group A, in which the probe aperture was the adjusted parameter, had the most influence, followed by Group B, in which exposure energy/μm was the adjusted parameter, and Group C, in which development time was the adjusted parameter.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

330-337

Citation:

Online since:

October 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Betzig, A. Harootunian, A. Lewis, M. Isaacson, Near-field diffraction by a slit: implication for super resolution microscopy, Applied Optics, 25 (1986) 1890-(1900).

DOI: 10.1364/ao.25.001890

Google Scholar

[2] E. Betzig, M. Isaacson, A. Lewis, Collection mode near-field scanning optical microscopy, Applied Physics Letters, 51 (1987) 2088-(2090).

DOI: 10.1063/1.98956

Google Scholar

[3] Balanis, C.A., Advanced engineering electromagnetic, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (1989).

Google Scholar

[4] Z.C. Lin, C.B. Yang, The near-field power density distribution characteristics for different type optical fiber probes, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26 (2005) 1289-1297.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-004-2107-6

Google Scholar

[5] A. Naber, H. Kock, H. Fuchs, High-resolution lithography with near-field optical microscopy, Scanning, 18 (1996) 567-571.

DOI: 10.1002/sca.4950180806

Google Scholar

[6] F.H. Dill, W.P. Hornberger, P.S. Hauge, J.M. Shaw, Characterization of positive photoresist, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, 22 (1975) 445-452.

DOI: 10.1109/t-ed.1975.18159

Google Scholar

[7] S.V. Babu, E. Barouch, Exact solution of Dill's model equation for positive photoresist kinetics, IEEE Electron Devices Letters, EDL-7 (1986) 252-253.

DOI: 10.1109/edl.1986.26362

Google Scholar

[8] C.A. Mack, Development of positive photoresists, The Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 134 (1987) 148-152.

Google Scholar

[9] Z.C. Lin, C.B. Yang, Analysis of point-fabrication model for nanometer-scale near field photolithography with experimental study, Scanning, 28 (2006) 32-41.

DOI: 10.1002/sca.4950280106

Google Scholar

[10] Z.C. Lin, C.B. Yang, Line segment fabrication model analysis of near field photolithography, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 223 (2009) 145-154.

DOI: 10.1243/09544054jem1210

Google Scholar

[11] Z.C. Lin, C.B. Yang, Combining the Taguchi method with an artificial neural network to construct a prediction model of near field photolithography experiments, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 224 (2010).

DOI: 10.1243/09544062jmes2055

Google Scholar