Phase Microscopy Method of Micro-Nano Sized Bubbles Based on Hilbert Phase Microscopy (HPM)

Article Preview

Abstract:

Measuring shape of bubbles is very important in many industrial processes, because that its behavior in the fluid is closely related to its morphology. Phase microscopy imaging (PMI) method is one of the best useful methods in this field. In the paper, considering on PMI idea, it is put out a new method which improves an ordinary light microscope into a dual function that can do both PMI and its ordinary microscopy function. Its optical structure is designed by using Mach-Zehnder interferometer method which can be added on the platform of ordinary microscope. A glass hole (bubble) is used as a sample to do phase microscopy imaging via the improved device. The results of the experiment and theory show that the phase distribution of bubble is closely related to the shape of it, which is very useful to detect the bubble’s behavior in the flow field. Besides bubbles, the improved microscope can be also used to observe the phase body such as cells.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

316-321

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. W. G. de Vries, A. Biesheuvel, and L. van Wijngaarden, International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 28, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] C. A. Acuña and J. A. Finch, International Journal of Mineral Processing. 94, (2010).

Google Scholar

[3] K.L. Lin, R.S. Bi, X.S. Tan, and S.Q. Zheng, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities. 23, 1 (2009).

Google Scholar

[4] Z. L. Liu, and Y. Zheng, Powder Technology. 168 (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] S. K. Jiang, W. Y. Fan, C. Y. Zhu, Y. G. Ma, and H. Z. Li, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 15, 4 (2007).

Google Scholar

[6] Y. G. Ma, X. Y. Ji, T. T. Fu, C. Y. Zhu, and D. J. Wang, Chemical Engineering. 37, 10 (2009).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Fernandino and T. Ytrehus, International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 32 (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] G. Popescu, Y. K. Park, N. Lue, C. B. Popescu, L. Deflores, R. R. Dasari, M. S. Feld, and K. Badizadegan, Am J Phy. Cell Phy. 295 (2008).

DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00121.2008

Google Scholar

[9] G. Popescu, L. P. Deflores, and J. C. Vaughan, Opt. Lett. 29, 21 (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] G. Popescu, R. R. Dasari, and M. S. Feld. Opt. Lett. 30, 10(2005).

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Wang, L. Millet, M. Mir, H. F. Ding, S. Unarunotai, J. Rogers, M. U. Gillette, and G. Popescu, Opt. Express. 19, 2 (2011).

DOI: 10.1364/oe.19.001016

Google Scholar

[12] H. F. Ding, Z. Wang, F. Nguyen, S. A. Boppart, L. J. Millet, M. U. Gillette, J. M. Liu, M. Boppart, and G. Popescu, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience. 7, 12 (2010).

DOI: 10.1166/jctn.2010.1637

Google Scholar

[13] Mustafa Mir, Z. Wang, K. Tangella, and G. Popescu, Opt. Express. 17, 4 (2009).

Google Scholar

[14] Mustafa Mir, H. F. Ding, Z. Wang, J. Reedy, K. Tanfella, and G. Popescu, Journal of Biomedical Optics. 15 (2010).

Google Scholar

[15] G. Popescu, Methods In Cell Biology. 90 (2008).

Google Scholar