Numerical and Experimental Studies on DNA Combing Used in Fabricating Nanochannel Electroporation (NEP) Chips

Article Preview

Abstract:

Microelectromechanical processes were used to generate a stamp with array of micro pillars. This stamp was subjected to DNA combing and imprinting to form nanostrands between the micro pillars, followed by sputter coating with gold, vapour deposition and imprinting processes in order to produce the required nanochannels for the gene chip. These preparation processes have been widely used to create implementations for cell manipulation and electroporation. However, the underlying mechanism of DNA stretching has only been demonstrated experimentally and is not fully understood. It, therefore, arrives unstable yield rate when process parameters are changed. This study investigated the DNA combing and imprinting processes using two-phase flow and moving mesh methods to analyse the variation of flow field at the micron level. It shows that while withdrawing from water, a smaller velocity difference in each location and the velocity difference of pillars are the major determinants of DNA stretching and curing. The simulation results showed that a bigger α and θ led to a greater difference in flow velocity on the PDMS stamp surface; greater flow velocity difference could affect the adhesion of DNA (subsequently compromising the formation of the nanochannels). As suggested by our experimental data, longer nanochannels (3 μm) displayed a wider range of stretching speed with yield rate >90%.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

421-429

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J. Gehl, T.H. Sorensen, K. Nielsen, P. Raskmark, S.L. Nielsen, T. Skovsgaard, and L.M. Mir, In vivo electroporation of skeletal muscle: threshold, efficacy and relation to electric field distribution, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1428 (1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4165(99)00094-x

Google Scholar

[2] R. Heller, M. Jaroszeski, A. Atkin, D. Moradpour, R. Gilbert, J. Wands, and C. Nicolau, In vivo gene electroporation ang expression in rat liver, FEBS Letter, 389 (1996), 225-228.

DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)00590-x

Google Scholar

[3] G. A. Hofmann, S. B. Dev, S. Dimmer, and G. S. Nanda, Electroporation Therapy: A New Approach for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer, IEEE Transactions on Bio-Medical Engineering. 46, 6(1999), 752-759.

DOI: 10.1109/10.764952

Google Scholar

[4] 4. Pouyan E. Boukany, Andrew Morss, Wei-ching Liao, Brian Henslee, HyunChul Jung, Xulang Zhang, Bo Yu, Xinmei Wang, Yun Wu, Lei Li, Keliang Gao, Xin Hu, Xi Zhao, O. Hemminger, Wu Lu, Gregory P. Lafyatis, and L. James Lee, Nano channel electroporation delivers preciseamounts of biomolecules into living cells. Nature nanotechnology, 6 (2011).

DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.164

Google Scholar

[5] A. K. Banga, S. Bose, and T. K. Ghosh, Review article-Iontophoresis and electroporation: comparisons and contrasts. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 179 (1999) 1-19.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(98)00360-3

Google Scholar

[6] V. Vijayanathan, T. Thomas, and T. J. Thomas, DNA nanoparticles and development of DNA delivery vehicles for gene therapy. Biochemistry. 41, 48(2002), 14085-14094.

DOI: 10.1021/bi0203987

Google Scholar

[7] V. Legrand, P. Leissner, A. Winter, M. Mehtali, and M. Lusky, Transductional targeting with recombinant adenovirus vectors. Current Gene Therapy. 2, 3(2002), 323-339.

DOI: 10.2174/1566523023347823

Google Scholar

[8] M. Trucco, P.D. Robbins, A.W. Thomson, and N. Giannoukakis, Gene therapy strategies to prevent autoimmune disorders. Current Gene Therapy, 2, 3(2002), 341-354.

DOI: 10.2174/1566523023347760

Google Scholar

[9] D. Luo and W. M. Saltzman, Enhancement of transfection by physical concentration of DNA at the cell surface, Nature Biotechnology. 18 (2000), 893-895.

DOI: 10.1038/78523

Google Scholar

[10] Guan J and Lee L J, Generating highly ordered DNA nanostrand arrays, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 102, 51(2005), 18321-18325.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506902102

Google Scholar

[11] Guan J, Yu B, and Lee L J, Forming Highly Ordered Arrays of Functionalized Polymer Nanowires by Dewetting on Micropillars. Advanced Materials. 19, 9(2007), 1212-1217.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.200602466

Google Scholar

[12] Guan J, Ferrell N, Yu B, Hansford D J, and Lee L J, Simultaneous fabrication of hybrid arrays of nanowires and micro/nanoparticles by dewetting on micropillars, Soft Matter. 3, 11(2007), 1369-1371.

DOI: 10.1039/b709910j

Google Scholar

[13] C H Lin, J Guan, S W Chau, and L J Lee, Experimental and numerical analysis of DNA nanostrand array formation by molecular combing on microwell-patterned surface, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 42, 2(2009), 1-8.

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/2/025303

Google Scholar

[14] Guan J, Boukany PE, Hemminger O, Chiou NR, Zha W, Cavanaugh M, and Lee LJ, Large laterally ordered nanochannel arrays from DNA combing and imprinting, Advanced Materials. 22, 36(2010), 3997-4001.

DOI: 10.1002/adma.201000136

Google Scholar

[15] P.T. Yue, J. J. Feng, C. Liu, and J. Shen, A diffuse-interface method for simulating two-phase flows of complex fluids. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 515 (2004), 293-317.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112004000370

Google Scholar

[16] Henrik Bruus, Theoretical microfluidics, (2005).

Google Scholar