Studies of Hard Interlayer’s Influence on the Creep Deformation of Salt Rock Cavity

Article Preview

Abstract:

The existence of interlayers has great influence on the stability of salt cavern. Based on the research results of creep test and other mechanical properties of salt rock and interlayer in Yunying Salt Mine, Hubei Province, cylindrical singular calculation model of salt rock cavity is built, and the corresponding simulation is conducted. Hard interlayer’s constraint influence on the creep contraction deformation of salt cavity is demonstrated. In addition, how the number of interlayers affects cavity radial deformation is discussed too. The results are important to oil-gas storage cavern modeling analysis in laminated salt rock.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 594-597)

Pages:

452-455

Citation:

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.H. Yang, Y.P. Li. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(23): 4226-4232(in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[2] C.H. Yang. Layered salt rock mechanical theoretic and engineering. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.

Google Scholar

[3] X.L. Huang, C.H. Yang, F. Chen, Y.P. Li. Rock and Soil Mechanics,2011,32(5):1473-1478 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[4] J. Liu. Experimental investigation and theoretic analysis on the mechanical properties of layered rock salt. Wuhan: Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2006.

Google Scholar

[5] X.Y. Yin. Influences of Mudstone Interlayer on the Stability of Oil /gas Storage in the Bedded Salt Rocks Formation. Wuhan: Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, CAS. (2008)

Google Scholar

[6] Y.P. Li, J. Liu, C.H. Yang., 2006,25 (12): 2461-2466(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] X.L. Huang, J. Xiong. Numerical simulation of gas leakage in bedded salt rock storage cavern. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 12, 254–259.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.05.040

Google Scholar