Study on the Rehabilitation of Eutrophic Water by Bacillus–Matrix–Plant Integrated System

Abstract:

Abstract. Caisson, which is composed of box, matrix and plant, plays an important role in the removal of SRP (solubility reaction phosphorus), NH4+-N and CODCr in eutrophic water. Bacillus can improve water quality effectively. Bacillus and caisson combination can further improve purification efficiency of wastewater. In this study, bacillus was added to the caisson to purify the aquaculture ponds water and removal efficiency of SRP, NH4+-N, CODCr was analyzed. The results showed that bacillus adding proportion had bigger effects on the removal rate of SRP than those of the matrix material and plant collocation, while, the matrix material had more removal efficiency on NH4+-N and CODCr than the bacillus adding proportion and plant collocation. The removal rates of SRP, NH4+-N and CODCr in the wastewater treated with 1‰ and1.5‰ bacillus were significantly higher than 0.5‰, but no significant difference was observed between1‰ and 5‰ bacillus treatments; among the three matrices of limestone, ceramsite and medical stone, the removal rate of SRP was highest in the treatment with medical stone, while the removal rates of NH4+-N and CODCr was highest in the treatment with ceramsite; there were significant differences in the removal rates of SRP, NH4+-N and CODCr between different plant configurations. The removal rate of SRP was up to 80.73% by the combination of bacillus (1‰), limestone, Cyperus alternifolius and Iris pseudacorus; the removal rates of NH4+-N and CODCr were 63.63% and 63.45% by the combination of bacillus (1.5‰), ceramsite, Ceratophyllum demersum and Iris pseudacorus respectively.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 599)
• Pages: 378-382
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.599.378
• Online since: November 2012
• Authors: Xian Zhi Lu, Jian Chao Hao, Hui Fen Liu, Xiu Ping Tian
• Keywords: Bacillus, Eutrophic Water, Matrix, Plant Configuration, Rehabilitation

References

[1] Kejun Wen, Liping Wu, Meng Duan, et al. Environmental Pollution and Control, 2010, 33(3):45-48. "In Chinese"

[2] Jin Ma, Kejun Wen, Liping Wu, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 30(4):4-6. "In Chinese"

[3] Kejun Wen, Tongqian Sun, Liwei Tu, et al. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 32(6):53-58. "In Chinese"

[4] Ying Liu, Guizhen Ding, Chuanhong Hu, et al. Freshwater Fisheries, 2004, 34(5):12-14. "In Chinese"

[5] Jixian Yang, Shanshan Gao, Fang Ma, et al. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2006, 34(19):4833-4834. "In Chinese"

[6] Castignetti D, Hollocher T. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1984, 47:620-624.

[7] Bowman R.A and Cole C.V. Soil Sci..1978, 125:95-101

[8] Xianqiang Tong, Jinzhong Li, Xueju Li, et al. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2004, 15(7):1261-1265. "In Chinese"

[9] Stottmeister U, WieSner A, Kuschk P, et al. Biotechnology Advances, 2003, 22:93-117.

[10] Xianzhi Lu, Xiuping Tian, Jianchao Hao, et al. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2008, 12:19-22. "In Chinese"

[11] Wei Yin, Peijun Li, Jinxiang Fu, et al. Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University (Natural Science), 2006, 22(6):985-988. "In Chinese"

[12] Yueping Jiang, Ying Ge, Chunlei Yue, et al. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(8):1718-1723. "In Chinese"