Multi-Objective Optimization of Human Resource Allocation in Production Cells with Different Training Modes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Aiming at the difference of the people as a particularity resource。In this paper ,the personnel training mode is divided into junior and senior, and a multi-objective integer programming model is established at the lowest cost of staff training, the highest man-machine adaptability degree and minimum personnel workload. Calculating example of a real production cell is presented. The results show that the model is correct and the necessity for classification of training modes.The model can help the management to adopt reasonable training mode and achieve desirable objectives.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

521-525

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Buzacott. J. A. The Impact of Worker Differences on Production System Output. International Journal of Production Economics, 2002, 78(1): 37-44.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(00)00086-4

Google Scholar

[2] Gokcen H., Agpak K. A Goal Programming Approach to Simple U-line Balancing Problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 171: 577-585.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.021

Google Scholar

[3] Slomp, J., Bokhorst, J., Molleman, E. Cross-training in a Cellular Manufacturing Environment. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2005, 48(10): 609-624.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2003.03.004

Google Scholar

[4] Azizi, N. Zolfaghari S., Liang M. Modeling Job Rotation in Manufacturing Systems: the Study of Employee's Boredom and Skill Variations. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 12: 69-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2009.07.010

Google Scholar

[5] Niemi, E. Worker Allocation in Make-to-order Assembly Cells. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2009, 25(6): 932-936.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2009.04.008

Google Scholar

[6] Corominas A., Pastor R., Plans J. Balancing Assembly Line with Skilled and Unskilled Workers. Omega, 2008, 36( 6) : 1126-1132.

DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.03.003

Google Scholar

[7] Digiesi S., Kock, A., Mummolo, G., Rooda J. The Effect of Dynamic Worker Behavior on Flow Line Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 2009, 120( 2) : 368-377.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.12.012

Google Scholar

[8] Dimitriadis S. Assembly Line Balancing and Group Working: A Heuristic Procedure for Workers' Groups Operating on the Same Product and Workstation. Computers and Operations Research, 2006, 33: 2757-2774.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2005.02.027

Google Scholar

[9] Cevikcan. E., Durmusoglu M., Unal M. A Team Oriented Design Methodology for Mixed Model Assembly Systems. Computer s and Industrial Engineering, 2009, 56( 2) : 576-599.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2007.11.002

Google Scholar

[10] H. YUE, J. SLOMP, E. MOLLEMAN and D. J. VAN DER ZEE: Worker flexibility in a parallel dual resource constrained job shop. J. International Journal of Production Research, 2008, 46(2), 451–467.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540601138510

Google Scholar