Stress Analysis of the Adhesive Used in a Hard Disk Drive Bearing Assembly Using Finite Element Model

Article Preview

Abstract:

The objective of this work is to determine the strength of the adhesive injected into the gap between the bearing and actuator arm surfaces under changes of nozzle position on the X and Y axis from the reference position using a finite element model. In this study, maximum stress and maximum shearing stress are used to indicate the adhesive strength. The minimum safety factor then is calculated to show the ratio of the yield strength to the maximum strength. The volume fraction is used to estimate the amount of adhesive on both parts of the bearing assembly. The result show, the maximum stress and strain peak for the case (0.25, 0.2) mm, σmax= 554.4 MPa, τmax= 319.6 MPa and Sfmin= 0.10. Setting the nozzle position to coordinates (0.2, 0.3) mm gave the lowest stress, σmax= 69.0 MPa, τmax= 39.2 MPa and Sfmin= 0.63. The nozzle position significantly affects the adhesive strength. If the nozzle is moved closer to the actuator arm, the stress distribution is better than placing the nozzle near the bearing. Therefore the suitable position for injection is (0.20, 0.30) mm, while the worst poor position is (0.25, 0.2) mm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 605-607)

Pages:

405-410

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. F. Luk, Y. C. Chan, and K. C. Hung, Application of adhesive bonding techniques in hard disk drive head assembly, Microelectronics Reliability, vol. 42, pp.767-777, April–May (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2714(02)00038-0

Google Scholar

[2] René Quispe Rodríguez, William Portilho de Paiva, Paulo Sollero, Marcelo Ricardo Bertoni Rodrigues, and Éder Lima de Albuquerque, Failure criteria for adhesively bonded joints, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 37, pp.26-36, September (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2012.01.009

Google Scholar

[3] Lisa Rielly, K. Srihari, and Jude Dilella, A systematic evaluation of adhesive deposition for mixed technology PCB assembly, in the 21st International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1997, pp.385-388.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(97)00118-6

Google Scholar

[4] Kosuke Haraga, Koichi Taguchi, Kimihiko Yoda, and Yoshinobu Nakashima, Assembly technique for control panel enclosures with the combined use of adhesive and rivets and the reduction of energy consumption, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 23, no. 5, pp.371-376, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(03)00066-6

Google Scholar

[5] Tetsuya Yoshida, Michihiro Takiguchi, and Fusahito Yoshida, Strength of Highly Ductile Acrylic Adhesive in Butt-Joint under Combined Tension and Torsion, Key Engineering Materials, vol. 274 - 276, pp.993-998, October (2004).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.274-276.993

Google Scholar

[6] Lijuan Liao, Takashi Kobayashi, Toshiyuki Sawa, and Yasuhiro Goda, 3-D FEM stress analysis and strength evaluation of single-lap adhesive joints subjected to impact tensile loads, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 31, no. 7, pp.612-619, June (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2011.06.008

Google Scholar

[7] Lucas F.M. da Silva and R.D. Adams, Joint strength predictions for adhesive joints to be used over a wide temperature range, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 27, no. 5, pp.362-379, (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2006.09.007

Google Scholar

[8] Bernd Burchardt, Kurt Diggelmann, Stephan Koch, and Bernhard Lanzendorfer, Elastic Bonding. Munchen, Germany: Verlag moderne industrie, (1998).

Google Scholar

[9] João Custódio, James Broughton, and Helena Cruz, A review of factors influencing the durability of structural bonded timber joints, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 29, no. 2, pp.173-185, March (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2008.03.002

Google Scholar

[10] L.D.R. Grant, R.D. Adams, and Lucas F.M. da Silva, Effect of the temperature on the strength of adhesively bonded single lap and T joints for the automotive industry, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 29, no. 5, pp.535-542, July (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2009.01.002

Google Scholar

[11] Dan He, Toshiyuki Sawa, Takeshi Iwamoto, and Yuya Hirayama, Stress analysis and strength evaluation of scarf adhesive joints subjected to static tensile loadings, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 30, no. 6, pp.387-392, September (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2010.02.002

Google Scholar

[12] Yang Rao, Daoqiang Lu, and C.P. Wong, A study of impact performance of conductive adhesives, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 24, no. 5, pp.449-453, October (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.12.003

Google Scholar

[13] M.R. Maheri and R.D. Adams, Determination of dynamic shear modulus of structural adhesives in thick adherend shear test specimens, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, vol. 22, no. 2, pp.119-127, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-7496(01)00043-4

Google Scholar

[14] ANSYS FLUENT Theory Guide, 140th ed. Southpointe, U.S.A.: ANSYS, Inc., (2011).

Google Scholar

[15] James M. Gere, Mechanics of Materials, 6th ed., Julie Ruggiero, Ed. Belmont, USA: Bill Stenquist, (2004).

Google Scholar

[16] William F. Riley, Leroy D. Sturges, and Don H. Morris, Static and Mechanics of Materials: An Integrated Approach, 2nd ed., Joseph Hayton, Ed. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (2002).

Google Scholar

[17] ANSYS Mechanical Application User's Guide, 140th ed. Canonsburg, USA: ANSYS, Inc., (2011).

Google Scholar