Experimental Study on the Removal of Flue Gas Mercury by Coal Fly Ash under UV Light Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

The mercury removal performance of the 150 mesh coal fly ash was evaluated through multiphase flow reactor designed by Shanghai University of Electric Power and different types of fly ash and absorption liquid were analyzed with HYDRA AA. The results showed that UV light almost had no oxidation capacity for gaseous mercury without fly ash, but the removal efficiency was significantly improved from 38.5% to 66.1% in the UV light by adding fly ash into the simulated flue gas. The fly ash after exposure to UV irradiation can improve the removal efficiency of Hg and the capture capacity of oxidized Hg had been greatly enhanced. Most of mercury adsorbed on the surface of fly ash in light conditions was Hg0 (g) and most Hg2+(g) stayed in the simulated flue gas and then was absorbed by absorption liquid.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

210-214

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jiang Wu, Yan Cao, Weiguo Pan, et al., Evaluation of mercury sorbents in a lab-scale multiphase flow reactor, a pilot-scale slipstream reactor and full-scale power plant, Chemical Engineering Science, 2008,63(3): 782-790.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2007.09.041

Google Scholar

[2] Carey T. R., et al., Enhanced Control of Mercury in wet FGD systems, Presented at the first Joint DOE_PETC power and Fuel Systems Contractors Conference, U.S department of Energy, Pittsburgh, PA,1996, 9-11.

Google Scholar

[3] Thomas K. Gale, Bruce W. Lani, George R. Offen. Mechanisms governing the fate of mercury in coal-fired power systems, Fuel Processing Technology, 2008, 89: 139-151.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.08.004

Google Scholar

[4] WU Cheng-jun, DUAN Yu-feng, ZHAO Chang-sui. Adsorption Characterization of Mercury by Fly Ashes During Co-combustion of Sludge and Coal, Proceedings of the CSEE, 2008, 28(14): 55-60.

Google Scholar

[5] Grant E. Dunham, et al., Fixed-bed Studies of the Interactions between Mercury and Coal Combustion Fly Ash, Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 82(2): 197-213.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(03)00070-5

Google Scholar

[6] Simona Bennici, Antonella Gervasini. CuO based catalysts on modified acidic silica supports tested in the de-NOx reduction.Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2005, 12(4) :307~312.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2004.01.032

Google Scholar

[7] Yeon-tae Yu, Preparation of nanocrystalline TiO2-coated coal fly ash and effect of iron oxides in coal fly ash on photocatalytic activity[J], POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 146 (2004) 154–159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2004.06.006

Google Scholar