Stressed Response of Submerged Elodea nattalii under Eutrophication Growth Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

Eutrophication in water bodies affects the growth of aquatic plants. In this study, we conducted static experiments to better understand the metabolic responses of Elodea nattalii under eutrophication conditions. The nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) levels in tissue, malondiadehyde (MDA), and activities of three antioxidases (peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT)) of Elodea nattalii cultured at different nutrient levels (oligotropher, mesotropher, eutropher, and hypertrophics) were investigated. The results showed that with nutrient concentration increase, N and P contents of Elodea nattalii increased. The MDA content improved with nutrient increase. the POD activity initially increased and later decreased. CAT and SOD activities decreased during the experimental time period. These finding suggested that changes in stem the increase of antioxidant enzyme activity can be served as the indicators of the response of Elodea nattalii to eutrophication conditions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 610-613)

Pages:

229-234

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Shilla, D.A., T. Asaeda, S. Kian, 2006. Wetlands Ecology & Management, 14:549-555

Google Scholar

[2] Bremiga M.T., S.M. Hanson, & P.A. Soranno,2005. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 43: 65-75

Google Scholar

[3] Zhu W, Zhang, LF, Cao JS, Wan L, & Mei XM., 2006. Water Resources Protection, 22: 36-39

Google Scholar

[4] Ni LY,2001. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management, 39:83-87

Google Scholar

[5] Xie Y., Yu D., & Bo R, 2004. Aquatic Botany, 80: 29-37

Google Scholar

[6] Thomaz S.M., P.A. Chambers, S.A. Pierini, & G. Pereira,2007. Aquatic Botany, 86: 191-196

Google Scholar

[7] Willis, C. & W. J. Mitsch, 1995. Ecological Engineering, 4: 65-76

Google Scholar

[8] Andrzej Rzepka; Jan Krupa; & Ireneusz lesak, 2005. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2:205-212

Google Scholar

[9] Wang J, Gu Y., & Zhu Z,2005. Journal of Applied Ecology, 16:337-340

Google Scholar

[10] Wang B & Li W,2002. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22:1616-1621

Google Scholar

[11] Cao T, Ni LY, & Xie P,2004. Journal of freshwater Ecology 19: 279-284

Google Scholar

[12] Nimptsch J,2007. Chemosphere, 66: 708-714

Google Scholar

[13] Cao T, & Ni LY,2004. Acta Hydrobiologica Sinica 28: 299-303

Google Scholar

[14] Yan CZ, Zheng AY. , JinXC. Zhao JZ, Xu QJ, & Wang XM , 2007. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(3):1050-1055

Google Scholar

[15] Lauridsen, T.L., J. P. Jensen, & E. Jeppesen, 2003. Hydrobiologia, 3:506-509.

Google Scholar

[16] Lundberg P., R.G. Weich, P. Jensen, H.J. Vogel(1989). Plant Physiology, 89:1380-1397

Google Scholar

[17] Baldy, V. M. Trémolières, M. Andrieu, & J. Belliard, 2007. Hydrobiologia, 575:343–351

Google Scholar

[18] Wang WH, & Ji M, 2006. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 23: 98-107

Google Scholar

[19] Chen XF., Chen KN, Zhang SD, & Wang QY,2005. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 14: 38-41

Google Scholar

[20] Li HS,2000. The Principle and Measuring Technique of Plant Physiology and Chemistry. Beijing Higher Education Press, Beijing.

Google Scholar

[21] Bowler C, C. Van Montague, & D. Inze,1992. Plant Molecular Biology 43:83-116

Google Scholar

[22] Barko, J. W. & R.M. Smart(1981). Aquatic Botany, 10: 339 – 352.

Google Scholar