Automatic Connection of GPIB Communication Protocol for Manufacturing System

Article Preview

Abstract:

Various types of communication were used in the factory. And the manufacturing system, machine, normally use GPIB communication due to their efficiency, cost, and high performance. However the GPIB protocol is different type by their manufacturing company. Therefore the system engineers often spend lots of time to setup and initialized their system for GPIB communication. In this paper, we proposed automatic connection module of GPIB communication for manufacturing system in their factory. The module can find their GPIB type and protocol, and access their communication efficiently. It also can reduce the system fault or communication jam when manufacturing system initialized setup process for GPIB and begin to interface between them.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

43-46

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Dhinesh Kumara, L. Karunamoorthy, Hubert Roth and T. T. Mirnalinee, Computers in manufacturing: towards successful implementation of integrated automation system, Technovation 25 (2005), pp.477-488.

DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2003.09.004

Google Scholar

[2] R. W. Brennan, P. Vrba, P. Tichy, A. Zoitl, C. Su¨nder, T. Strasser and V. Marik, Developments in dynamic and intelligent reconfiguration of industrial automation, Computers in Industry 59 (2008), pp.533-547.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compind.2008.02.001

Google Scholar

[3] Swales A and Meng M. Transparent factories through industrial internets. IEEE Conf. Electrical Comput Eng (1999), pp.931-936.

Google Scholar

[4] Min-Hsiung Hung, Johnny Tsai, Fan-Tien Cheng and Haw-Ching Yang, Development of an Ethernet-based equipment integration framework for factory automation, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 20 (2004), pp.369-383.

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2002.1013453

Google Scholar

[5] Devaraj Ayavoo, Michael J. Pont, Michael Short and Stephen Parker, Two novel shared-clock scheduling algorithms for use with Controller Area Network, and related protocols, Microprocessors and Microsystems, Volume 31, Issue 5, 1 August (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.micpro.2006.11.002

Google Scholar

[6] Steve Biegacki and Dave Van Gompel, The application of DeviceNet in process control, ISA Transactions, Volume 35, Issue 2, (1996), pp.169-176.

DOI: 10.1016/0019-0578(96)00022-5

Google Scholar

[7] Eduardo André Mossin, Rodrigo Palucci Pantoni and Dennis Brandão, A fieldbus simulator for training purposes, ISA Transactions, Volume 48, Issue 1, January (2009), pp.132-141.

DOI: 10.1016/j.isatra.2008.07.005

Google Scholar

[8] Leite Bruno Mota André, A Comparison between LAN and GPIB Instrument Interfaces in a Automated Test System, The Eighth International Conference on Electronic Measurement and Instruments, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/icemi.2007.4350562

Google Scholar

[9] Nathan Wilson, Leon Dennis, Dave Westenhaver and Ron Barker, Upgrading GPIB Antenna Test System to Ethernet, Aerospace Conference 2005 IEEE, 0-7803-8870-4/05, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/aero.2005.1559679

Google Scholar