An Alternative Method to Determine Measuring Instrument Fitness for Use

Lua Kheng Leong

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.622-623.1401

Paper Titles

The Design and Implementation of Ship Electric Field Measurement System Based on MSP430
p.1378

Localization Technology Basing Two-Dimensional Vector Sensor
p.1384

Structural Health Monitoring of Thin Aluminum Plate Using Acoustic Sensors
p.1389

Temperature Effect on the Sensitivity of a Highly Sensitive Micro-Machined Displacement Sensor
p.1396

An Alternative Method to Determine Measuring Instrument Fitness for Use
p.1401

Determining Blade Pitch Angle Sensitivity for PID Controller
p.1405

Dynamic Surface Tension of Ionic Liquid [C₁₀(EP_y)₂]Br₂ Using Maximum Bubble Pressure Method
p.1410

Development of Inspection System for Crack in R.C. Tunnel Lining by Using Knowledge-Based System (KBS)
p.1415

Real-Time Pollution Monitoring Model of Convection Heating Surfaces Based on Coal Online Soft Sensing
p.1421

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 622-623An Alternative Method to Determine Measuring...

An Alternative Method to Determine Measuring Instrument Fitness for Use

Abstract:

Conventional methods to determine measuring instrument fitness for use or at time refers to accuracy of measuring instrument include adopt the accuracy of measuring instrument derives from the specification of the instrument itself, or error of reading from calibration certificate or multiples of resolution and some even consider calibration renders fitness for use. The common weaknesses of these conventional methods do not take into consideration of measurement uncertainty and measurement requirements. This paper researches into an alternative method in line with recent development in metrology as well as users requirements. It not only taking measurement cost into consideration, also meets the requirement of ISO QMS measuring instrument management requirements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Manufacturing Science and Technology III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 622-623)

Pages:

1401-1404

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.622-623.1401

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Lua Kheng Leong

Keywords:

Accuracy, Calibration, Correction, Error, Fit for Purpose, Measurement Uncertainty, Measuring Instrument Fitness for Use, Metrological Requirement, Metrological Traceability

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] JCGM 200: 2008: International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms, VIM 3. 2.

Google Scholar

[2] JCGM 200: 2008: International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms, VIM 2. 41.

Google Scholar

[3] SPRING Singapore , Technical Notes MET 001: Specific requirements for calibration and measurement laboratory, SAC, (2010), Pg 5 – 7.

Google Scholar

[4] UKAS, LAB24: Calibration and traceability in mechanical testing of metallic materials, (2000), Pg 4-7, 11-20.

Google Scholar

[5] UKAS, LAB 21: Calibration and traceability for construction materials, (2000), Pg 5-6, 9-27.

Google Scholar

[6] UKAS, LAB 14: Calibration of weighing machine, Edition 4, (2006), Pg 2-4, 8.

Google Scholar

[7] OIML R111-1: Weights of class E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M1-2, M2, M2-3, M3, Part 1 Metrological and technical requirements, (2004), Pg 11.

Google Scholar

[8] Er. R.K. Jain, Engineering Metrology, 7th edition, (2000), Khanna Publishers, Pg 9.

Google Scholar

[9] Forrest W. Breyfogle III: Implementing Six Sigma smarter solutions using statistical methods, second edition, (2003), John Wiley, Pg 306-341.

DOI: 10.1002/qre.369

Google Scholar

[10] AIAG Measurement systems analysis reference manual, 4th edition, (2010), Pg 15.

Google Scholar

[11] JCGM 200: 2008: International vocabulary of metrology – basic and general concepts and associated terms, VIM 2. 26.

Google Scholar