The Effects of Electromigration to the Solder Joint Formation: A Comparison Between 99.3Sn-0.7Cu and 96.5Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu Lead Free Solder

Article Preview

Abstract:

Electromigration effects on the solder joint formation of 99.3Sn-0.7Cu and 96.5Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu lead-free solder with Cu electroplated Ni layer wire were investigated. The electromigration effects on the solder joints were studied after current density stressing at 1 x 103 A/cm2 in room temperature for 0 h, 120 h, and 240 h. The research work found that intermetallic compound (IMC) formation on the joint is increases for both solders with longer period of current stress applied. Higher IMC thickness growth in 99.3Sn-0.7Cu solder joint compared to 99.3Sn-0.7Cu is detected and both anode regions of the solder joints show higher IMC thickness growth compared to cathode region. Experimental results show 99.3Sn-0.7Cu solder joint is more prone to failure under current stress compared to 96.5Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu solder joint with thicker IMC which translates to higher brittleness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 622-623)

Pages:

195-199

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.Y. Lee: J. Mater. Research, Vol. 17, No. 2 (2002), pp.291-301.

Google Scholar

[2] MohdSalleh M. A. A., M.M.A. Bakri, H. Kamarudin, M. Bnhussain, Z. M. H, and F. Somidin, Physics Procedia, Vol. 22 (2011), pp.299-304.

DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2011.11.047

Google Scholar

[3] MohdSalleh M. A. A., Hazizi M. H. Z., Ahmad Z. A., Hussin K., and Ahmad K. R., Advanced Material Research, Vol. 227 (2011), pp.106-111.

Google Scholar

[4] B. -J. Lee, N.M. Hwang and H.M. Lee: Acta Mater., Vol. 45, No. 5 (1997), pp.1867-1874.

Google Scholar

[5] K. -W. Moon, W.J. Boettinger, U.R. Kattner, F.S. Biancaniello and C.A. Handwerker: J. Electr. Mater., Vol. 29, No. 10 (2000), pp.1122-1136.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Abtew and G. Selvaduray: Materials Science and Engineering, R: Reports 27 (2000) 95-141.

Google Scholar

[7] J.W. Yoon, S.W. Kim and S.B. Jung: J. Alloys Comp., Vol. 385, No. 1-2 (2004), pp.192-198.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. C Chan, Alex C. K So and J.K. L Lai: Mater. Science and Eng. B, Vol. 55, Issues 1-2 (1998, pp.5-13.

Google Scholar

[9] Xin Ma, Yiyu Qian, and F. Yoshida: J. Alloys and Comp., Vol. 334, Issues 1-2 (2002), pp.224-227.

Google Scholar

[10] H.L. J Pang, K. H Tan, X. Q Shi, and Z. P Wang: Mat. Science and Eng. A, Vol. 307, Issues 1-2 (2001), pp.42-50.

Google Scholar

[11] Hsiu-Jen Lin, Jian-Shian Lin, and Tung-Han Chuang, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 487 (2009), pp.458-465.

Google Scholar

[12] L.D. Chen, M.L. Huang, and S.M. Zhou, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, Vol. 504 (2010), pp.535-541.

Google Scholar

[13] H. Gan, W.J. Choi, G. Xu, and K.N. Tu: (2002). JOM J. Minerals, Metals and Mat. Society, Vol. 54, No. 6 (2002), pp.34-37.

Google Scholar

[14] Choa, B: J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 100, 8 (2006), pp.084909-10.

Google Scholar

[15] F. Wang, X. Ma and Y. Qian: Scripta Mater., Vol. 53, No. 6 (2005), pp.699-702.

Google Scholar