Determination of Forming Limit Curves of Steel Pipes for Hydroformability Evaluation

Abstract:

The aims of this research are to establish the forming limit curve (FLC) of tubular material low carbon steels commonly used in Thai industry, verify these FLCs with real part forming experiments and compare these experimentally obtained FLCs against analytical ones available in FEA software database. A self-designed bulge forming apparatus of fixed bulge length and a hydraulic test machine with axial feeding are used to carry out the bulge tests. Loading paths resulting to linear strain paths at the apex of the bulging tube are determined by FE simulations in conjunction with a self-compiled subroutine. These loading paths are used to control the internal pressure and axial feeding punch of the test machine. In this work a common low carbon steel tubing grade STKM 11A, with 28.6 mm outer diameter and 1.2 mm thick is studied. Circular grids are electro chemically etched onto the surface of tube samples. Subsequently, the tube samples are bulge-formed. The forming process is stopped when a burst is observed on the forming sample. After conducting the bulge tests, major and minor strains of the grids located beside the bursting line on the tube surface are measured to construct the forming limit curve (FLC) of the tubes. The forming limit curves determined for these tubular materials are put to test in formability evaluations of test parts forming in real experiment. It was found that the tool geometry can keep the strain ratio constant is not dependent on the thickness but only on OD of the tube, as in equations L=OD and r_d=(15xOD)/25.4. The experimen-tal FLDs have predicted failures in forming process consistently with the real experiments. The ex-perimentally obtained forming limit curves (determined following STKM 11A) differ from empiri-cal one (from FEA software) and analytical one by about 0.02339 and 0.15736 true strain respec-tively at FLD0, the corresponding plane strain values.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 622-623)
• Pages: 484-488
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.622-623.484
• Online since: December 2012
• Authors: Ramil Kesvarakul, Suwat Jiratheranat, Bhadpiroon Sresomroeng
• Keywords: FLC, Forming Limit Curve, Tube Bulge Test, Tube Hydroforming Process

References

[1] Ahmetoglu M.: Tube hydroforming: current research, applications and need for training. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 98 (2000) 224-231.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00203-4

[2] Altan T.: Evaluation of tube formability and material characteristics. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 98 (2000).

[3] Asnafi N.: Theoretical and experimental analysis of stroke-controlled tube hydroforming. Materials Science and Engineering A279 (2000) 95–110.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(99)00646-2

[4] Chen J.: Sheet metal forming limit prediction based on plastic deformation energy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology (2009).

[5] Chu E.: Influences of generalized loading parameters on FLD predictions for aluminum tube hydroforming. Journal of materials processing technology 196 (2008) 1–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.06.050

[6] F. Dohmann Hydroforming: A method to manufacture light-weight parts. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 60 (1996) 669-676.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-x

[7] Hwang Y.M.: Analysis of tube bulge forming in an open die considering anisotropic effects of the tubular material. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 46 (2006) 1921–(1928).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.01.025

[8] Hwang Y.M.: Forming limit diagrams of tubular materials by bulge tests. Journal of Materials Processing Technology (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.01.026

[9] Kang S.B.: Analytical and numerical approach to prediction of forming limit in tube hydroforming. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 47 (2005) 1023–1037.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.02.011

[10] Koc M. Hydroforming for advanced manufacturing. Woodhead publishing in materials.