An Improved K-ω Model for High Speed Flows

Article Preview

Abstract:

An improved K-ω model, which allows for compressible corrections, is proposed in this paper. Numerical scheme was established utilizing the improved Total Variation Diminishing (TVD) scheme and applying implicit scheme to the negative source terms of the turbulence model. Hypersonic flat-plate boundary-layer flows and hypersonic compression ramp flows marked with separation, reattachment and shock/boundary layer interactions are then computed. Comparisons between the computational results, the experimental results and the semi-empirical formulations show that the compressible correction term of the K-ω turbulence model is a pressure-dilatation correlation. In addition, for flow with separation and without separation, calculation results of wall pressures, friction coefficients and wall heat transfer rate distributions using the improved model and established scheme agree better with the experimental results than that using the original K-ω model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

593-600

Citation:

Online since:

December 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Huang P.G., Bradshaw P., and Coakley T.J., Turbulence Models for Compressible Boundary Layers [J]. AIAA. J., 1994, V32(4): 735-740.

DOI: 10.2514/3.12046

Google Scholar

[2] Taulbee D. and VanOsdol J., Modeling Turbulent Compressible Flows: the Mass Fluctuating Velocity and Squared Density[R]. AIAA-91-0524.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1991-524

Google Scholar

[3] Lele S.K., Compressibility Effects on Turbulence [J]. Annual Review Fluid Mechanics, 1994, V26: 211-254.

Google Scholar

[4] Sarkar S., The Stabilizing Effect of Compressibility in Turbulent Shear Flow[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, V282: 163-186.

DOI: 10.1017/s0022112095000085

Google Scholar

[5] Wilcox D C. Reassessment of the Scale-Determining Equation for Advanced Turbulence Models[J]. AIAA. J., 1988, V26(11): 1299-1310.

DOI: 10.2514/3.10041

Google Scholar

[6] Yee H C, Klopfer G. H, Montagne J L. High-Resolution Shock-Capturing Schemes for Inviscid and Viscous Hypersonic Flows [J]. J Comp Phys, 1990, 88: 31-61.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(90)90241-r

Google Scholar

[7] Zheng B, Lee C H. The Effects of Limiters on High Resolution Computations of Hypersonic Flows over Bodies with Complex Shapes [J]. Comm Nonlin Sci Numer Simul, 1998, 3(2): 82-87.

DOI: 10.1016/s1007-5704(98)90068-5

Google Scholar

[8] Wilcox D C. Turbulence Modeling for CFD [M]. California: DCW Industries, Inc., 2000: 235-239.

Google Scholar

[9] Sarkar S. The Pressure-Dilatation Correlation in Compressible Flows [J]. Physics of Fluids A, 1992, V4(12): 2674–2682.

DOI: 10.1063/1.858454

Google Scholar

[10] Speziale C.G., Abid R., Anderson E.C., Critical Evaluation of Two-equation Models for Near-wall Turbulence [J]. AIAA J., 1992, V30(2): 324-331.

DOI: 10.2514/3.10922

Google Scholar

[11] Liu, J. Development of High-Mach-Number Rans Turbulence Model and Numerical Simulation of Hypersonic Flows [D]. Beijing: Beihang University (2007).

Google Scholar

[12] Barakos G., Drikakis D., Implicit Unfactored Implementation of Two-Equation Turbulence Models in Compressible Navier-Stokes Methods [J]. International Journal of Numerical Method in Fluids, 1998, V28: 73-94.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19980715)28:1<73::aid-fld700>3.0.co;2-r

Google Scholar

[13] Menter F.R., Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications[J]. AIAA J., 1994, V32(8): 1598-1605.

DOI: 10.2514/3.12149

Google Scholar

[14] Settles G S, Dodson L J. Hypersonic Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Database[R]. NASA-CR-177577, (1991).

Google Scholar

[15] White, F. M., translated by Wei Z., Zhen S. Viscous Fluid Flow [M]. Beijing: National Mechanics Industry Press, 1982: 638.

Google Scholar