Teratogenicity Assessment of Dental Implants

Jian Liu; Yang Yang; Fen Ju Liu; Qing Fang Liu

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.630.420

Paper Titles

Robust Reliable Control for a Class of Uncertain Discrete-Time Systems with Multiple Time-Varying Delays
p.396

Analyzing the Influence of Rigid Foundation on Seismic Response of Cable-Stayed Bridge Pylon
p.402

Study on Blood Compatibility of a Central Venous Catheter and its Pyrogen Test
p.409

Evaluation of the Effects of Sterilization by Irradiation on Teratogenic Toxicity of Central Vein Catheter
p.414

Teratogenicity Assessment of Dental Implants
p.420

Geometrical Comparison between Chinese and European-American Cervical Vertebrae
p.425

Development of a Miniature Strain Gauge
p.431

Applying RFID Technology in Tourism Industry: The Case Study of Hotel in Taipei
p.439

The Solution to the Conflict Problem Based on the Physical Behavior Analysis of Invention Principles
p.446

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vol. 630Teratogenicity Assessment of Dental Implants

Teratogenicity Assessment of Dental Implants

Abstract:

To evaluate the teratogenicity of the dental implant and provide a basis for safe applications of medical products. Chromosome aberration test, micronucleus test and the Ames test of the dental implant samples were performed. The results showed that samples of the dental implant did not cause chromosomal aberrations, nor induced the increase of bone marrow cells micronucleus incidence; Compared with the control groups, the number of revertant colonies did not increase significantly in the dental implant extracts and 1/5, 1/25 diluted groups, both under the activation and non-activation conditions, suggesting that no mutagenic effect was caused by the dental implant samples. All of the results indicated that the dental implant could not induce any teratogenic toxicity or carcinogenic and toxicity, so the dental implant can be safely used in clinical practice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volume 630)

Pages:

420-424

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.630.420

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

December 2012

Authors:

Jian Liu, Yang Yang, Fen Ju Liu, Qing Fang Liu

Keywords:

Ames Test, Chromosome Aberration Test, Dental Implant, Micronucleus Test, Teratogenic Toxicity

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Albrektsson, T; Zarb, G; Worthington, P. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 1986; 1: 11-25.

Google Scholar

[2] Peppas NA, Langer, R. RNew challenges in biomaterials Science 1994; 263: 1715-20.

Google Scholar

[3] Gahyva SM, Siqueira JF Jr. Direct genotoxicity and mutagenicity of endodontic substances and materials as evaluated by two prokaryotic test systems. J Appl Oral Sci 2005; 13: 387-392.

DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572005000400014

Google Scholar

[4] ISO10993-3. Biological evaluation of medical devices-part3: Tests for Genotoxicity[S]. 2003: 3-4.

Google Scholar

[5] HAO Libo, ZHANG Xiaobin, XING Qingchang, et al. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research , 2008，12(45); 8823-8826.

Google Scholar

[6] Böning A, Scheewe J, Ivers T, et al. Phosphorylcholine or heparin coating for pediatric extracorporeal circulation causes similar biologic effects in neonates and infants. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg , 2004, 127(5): 1458-1465.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.051

Google Scholar

[7] Hong CE, Lyu SY. Genotoxicity detection of five medicinal plants in Nigeria. J Toxicol Sci 2011; 36: 87-93.

DOI: 10.2131/jts.36.87

Google Scholar

[8] Mortelmans K, Zeiger E (November 2000). The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay,. Mutat. Res. 455 (1–2): 29–60.

DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(00)00064-6

Google Scholar