The Application of Biological Materials on the Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of Knee-Joint in Athletic Injury

Abstract:

It is Important content that to make Surface modification and surface modification and Improve the material on the surface of the cell adhesion and promotes cell proliferation to bone tissue engineering scaffolds. The role of osteoblast and support material dependent on the Material surface characteristics, Local shape, surface energy and chemical energy, which Determine how cells adsorbed onto the surface of the material and Localization of cells and cell function behavior. Therefore, the complexity of biomaterials and cell biological material surface interaction determines the biological scaffold materials for surface modification of importance. Ideal surface modification should take into consideration the surface topology, specific identification, hydrophilic and hydrophobic protein adsorption equilibrium, and other aspects of functional new tissues. At present, the most applications in surface modification of materials is type I collagen, future research will be a variety of surface modification of materials for composite materials, which will play complementary roles, as well as gene therapy and the development of nanometer materials, it will become a hot issue in the field of bone tissue engineering.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 643)
• Pages: 25-28
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.643.25
• Online since: January 2013
• Authors: Kai Liu
• Keywords: Athletic Injury, Biological Materials, Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction of Knee-Joint

References

[1] N.A. Ramaniraka, A. Terrier, N. Theumann, O. Siegrist. Effects of the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the biomechanics of the knee joint: a finite element analysis. Clinical Biomechanics, Volume 20, Issue 4, May 2005, Pages 434-442.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.11.014

[2] Kate E. Webster, Julian A. Feller, Joanne E. Wittwer. Longitudinal changes in knee joint biomechanics during level walking following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Gait & Posture, Volume 36, Issue 2, June 2012, Pages 167-171.

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.02.004

[3] Jong Keun Seon, Hemanth R. Gadikota, Michal Kozanek, Luke S. Oh, Thomas J. Gill, Guoan Li. The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction on Kinematics of the Knee With Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Subtotal Medial Meniscectomy: An In Vitro Robotic Investigation. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, Volume 25, Issue 2, February 2009, Pages 123-130.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.09.020

[4] James K. Horstman, Faisal Ahmadu-Suka, R.W. Norrdin. Anterior cruciate ligament fascia lata allograft reconstruction: Progressive histologic changes toward maturity. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, Volume 9, Issue 5, October 1993, Pages 509-518.

DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(05)80397-4

[5] J.F. Cummings, E.S. Grood, D.L. Butler, M.S. Levy. Subject variation in caprine anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Volume 20, Issue 5, September 2002, Pages 1009-1015.

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00034-7