Study of Colloidal Gold Strip in Detecting the Antibody of Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea

Article Preview

Abstract:

Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus (PEDV) infection has caused huge economic losses, but no serological method is available for batch detection of field samples. The aim of the study was to develop a method for large-batch detection of PEDV infection. Colloidal gold-labeled staphylococcal protein A (SPA) was sprayed on glass fibers to prepare a conjugate pad. The recombinant N protein of PEDV was blotted on the test line of the nitrocellulose (NC) membrane, and pig IgG was streaked on the control line of the NC membrane. The immunochromatographic strip was used for detection of antibodies against PEDV. The results showed that the strip test was simple and the results could be determined within 10 min with naked eyes. The test strip was highly specific for pig serum against PEDV and no cross-reaction was observed. The test strip had close similarity with ELISA. Storage at room temperature for 6 months did not affect the specificity and sensitivity obviously. A total of 320 clinical pig sera were detected by both ELISA and the developed test strip, and the coincidence was 96.3 %. Therefore, the developed immunochromatographic strip is specific, sensitive, stable, fast and simple, and it is suitable for on-site detection of antibodies against PEDV.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

538-542

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Callbaut, P., DeBouck, P., Pensaert, M. Vet. Microbiol 7: 295-306. ( 1982).

Google Scholar

[2] Carvajal, A., Diego, R., Lanza, I., Diego, R., Rubio, P., Carmenes, P. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest 7: 60-64. (1995).

Google Scholar

[3] Cui, S., Zhou, S., Chen, C., Qi, T., Zhang, C., Oh, J. J. Virol. Methods 152: 38-42. ( 2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Grabar K C., Freeman R G., Hommer M B., Natan M J. Anal Chem 67: 735-743. (1995).

Google Scholar

[5] Hedstrom, J., Svens, E., Kenkimaki, P., Kemppainen, E., Puolakkainen, P., Haapiainen, R., Stenman, U.H. J. Clin. Lab. Invest 58: 611-616. (1998).

Google Scholar

[6] Hofmann, M., Wyler, R. Vet. Microbiol 21: 263-273. (1990).

Google Scholar

[7] Hou X.L., Yu L.Y., Liu J. Vet Microbiol 123 (1-3): 86-92. (2007).

Google Scholar

[8] Knuchel, M., Ackermann, M., Muler, H.K., Kihm, U. Vet. Micobiol 32: 117-134(1992).

Google Scholar

[9] Mikawa, A.Y., Santos, S.A., Kenfe, F.R., da Silva, F.H., da Costa, P.I. J. Virol. Methods 158: 160-164. (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] Pensaert, M.B. p.179–185. In: Straw, B.E., Allaire, S.D., Mengeling, W.L., Taylor, D.J. (Eds. ), Diseases of Swine. Iowa State University Press, Iowa. (1999).

Google Scholar

[11] Sturman, L.S., Holmes, K.V. Adv. Virus Res. 28: 35-112. (1983).

Google Scholar

[12] Zhou, Y.L., Ederveen, J., Egberink, H., Pensaert, M., Horzinek, M.C. Arch. Virol 102: 63-71. (1998).

Google Scholar