Structure and Properties of Chitosan/Poly-Lactic Acid Blend Scaffold and Chitosan Powder/Poly-Lactic Acid Blend Scaffold

Article Preview

Abstract:

The chitosan (CS) /poly-L-lactic (PLLA) acid blend scaffolds were prepared by two kinds of blend solutions through immersion precipitation phase inversion method. CS/PLLA blend scaffold was fabricated by mixing the CS-HAc solution and PLLA-DMF solution, CSP/PLLA blend scaffold was fabricated by mixing chitosan powder (CSP) and PLLA-DMF solution. The results revealed that CS content in CSP/PLLA scaffold was 126 times higher than that in CS/PLLA scaffold. The difference of CS content made the structures of CS/PLLA scaffold and CSP/PLLA scaffold exhibit an obvious discrepancy, which resulted from the different thermodynamics and phase separation behavior of two blend solutions. CS/PLLA scaffold with a higher porosity took on an unsymmetrical structure with a compact upper surface and a porous cross-section containing the fingerlike macrovoids, while CSP/PLLA scaffold displayed a symmetrical structure with a porous upper surface and the sponge-like cross-section. WVTR and equilibrium swelling of CSP/PLLA blend scaffold were higher than that of CS/PLLA blend scaffold. WAXD analysis revealed that PLLA and CS did not crystallize in the course of CS/PLLA scaffold formation, while there were the diffraction peaks of PLLA and CS in the CSP/PLLA scaffold.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

9-15

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] A. Sarasam, and S. V. Madihally, Biomaterials, 26, 5500(2005).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Wan, H. Wu, X. Y. Cao, and S. Dalai, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 93, 1736(2008).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Prabaharana, and R. Jayakumar, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 44, 320(2009).

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Q Wan., J. Yang, J. L. Yang, J. Z. Bei, and S. G. Wang, Biomaterials, 24, 3757(2003).

Google Scholar

[5] Y. Wan, H. Wu, X. Y. Cao, and S. Dalai, Polym. Degrad. Stab., 93, 1736(2008).

Google Scholar

[6] T. Sato, G. Chen, T. Ushida, T. Ishii, N. Ochiai, and T. Tatsuya, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 17, 83(2001).

Google Scholar

[7] W. L. Xu, W. G Cui., W. B. Li, and W. Q. Guo, Powder Technol., 140, 136(2004).

Google Scholar

[8] 8 J. H. Kim, B. R. Min, H. C. Park, J. Won, and Y. S. Kang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 81, 3481(2001).

Google Scholar

[9] J. H. Huang, Polym. Test, 26, 685(2007).

Google Scholar

[10] D.Y. Zuo, Y. B. Chen, Y. Z. Tao and W. L. Xu, Polymer Bulletin, 62, 713 (2009).

Google Scholar

[11] B. Stropnik and V. Kaiser, Desalination, 145(2002).

Google Scholar

[12] M. L. Yeow, Y. T. Liu and K. Li, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 92, 1782(2004).

Google Scholar

[13] D. Y. Zuo, W. L. Xu, H. T. Zou, and Y. Y. Xu, Chinese J. Polym. Sci., 4, 405(2008).

Google Scholar

[14] J. G. Wijmans, J. Membr. Sci., 237, 39(2004).

Google Scholar