Comparative Study on Multiobjective Power Unit Coordinated Control Problem via Differential Evolution and Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithms

Article Preview

Abstract:

Power unit coordinated control (PUCC) problem was being focused by many optimizers as a serious task to be tackled in several aspects. Through this paper differential evolution (DE) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms are implemented to solve the PUCC problem. With considering four objectives to be optimized: minimization of tracking error in load power demand, fuel consumption, throttling losses due to steam control valve, and feeding water. Simulation experiments are made through case-study by aid of MATLAB programs to develop the required comparison through the two algorithms.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

470-475

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Leĭzerovich, A.S., Steam turbines for modern fossil-fuel power plants. The Fairmont Press, Inc. (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Lee, K.Y., Modern heuristic optimization techniques: Theory and applications to power systems. Vol. 39, Wiley-IEEE press. (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] Garduno-Ramirez, R. and K.Y. Lee, Multiobjective optimal power plant operation through.

Google Scholar

[4] coordinate control with pressure set point scheduling. Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2001), pp.115-122.

DOI: 10.1109/60.921461

Google Scholar

[5] Heo, J.S., K.Y. Lee, and R. Garduno-Ramirez, Multiobjective control of power plants using.

Google Scholar

[6] particle swarm optimization techniques. Energy Conversion, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 21, No. 2: (2006), pp.552-561.

Google Scholar

[7] Van Sickel, J.H., P. Venkatesh, and K.Y. Lee. Analysis of the pareto front of a multi-objective optimization problem for a fossil fuel power plant. IEEE, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2008.4596904

Google Scholar

[8] Head, J.D., et al. Implementation of a multi-agent system for optimized multiobjective powerplant control. IEEE (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] Liu, X., P. Guan, and C. Chan, Nonlinear Multivariable Power Plant Coordinate Control by.

Google Scholar

[10] Constrained Predictive Scheme. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 18, No. 5 (2010), pp.1116-1125.

Google Scholar

[11] Li, S., et al., A new coordinated control strategy for boiler-turbine system of coal-fired power plant. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions on, Vol. 13, No. 6 (2005), pp.943-954.

DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2005.854319

Google Scholar

[12] Chakraborty, U.K., Advances in differential evolution. Vol. 143. Springer-Verlag New York Incorporated. (2008).

Google Scholar

[13] Tasgetiren, M.F. and P. Suganthan. A multi-populated differential evolution algorithm forsolving constrained optimization problem. IEEE. (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/cec.2006.1688287

Google Scholar

[14] Clerc, M., Particle swarm optimization. Wiley-ISTE. (2006).

Google Scholar

[15] Bell, R. and K.J. Åström, Dynamic models for boiler-turbine-alternator units: data logs and.

Google Scholar

[16] parameter estimation for a 160 MW unit. Lund Institute of Technology, Dept. of Automatic Control. (1987).

Google Scholar