Optimized Product Design Methodology: A Combinatorial Reverse Logistic Cost-Benefit Analysis Model of WEEPs

Article Preview

Abstract:

The growing amount of waste electrical and electronic products has been a tough issue in many countries. Widely expressed public concern for the environment and increasingly stringent regulations have been putting pressure on related manufacturers, forcing them to produce and dispose products in an environmentally responsible manner. Thus, during the conception and development of products, emphasis is now being put on designing products for ease of recycling and disposal. This paper presents a mathematical programming model as a tool for identifying the best design plan for optimization of WEEPs reverse logistic cost among alternative schemes. The monetary factors in the model includes the costs of main activities during the whole product recycling process, which consists of transportation, inspection, clean, repair, disassembly, materials recovery and wastes disposal as well as the benefits derived from returned products to be reused and recovered and energy acquired from the solid wastes incineration. Based on the presented model, designers could figure out the best combination options in materials, structural layout and inter-part connections. Finally, different design plans for optical mouse are discussed as a case example to offer a better insight into the proposed model and product design methodology.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

692-697

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] He, W., Li, G., Ma, X., Wang, H., Huang, J. and Xu, M.: WEEE recovery strategies and the WEEE treatment status in China, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 136(3) (2006), 502-512.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.060

Google Scholar

[2] Pitipong Veerakamolmal and S. M. Gupta, A combinatorial cost-benefit analysis methodology for designing modular electronic products for the environment, Proceedings of the I999 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, May 11-13 (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/isee.1999.765888

Google Scholar

[3] Bereketli, I., Genevois, M. E., Albayrak, Y. E. and Ozyol, M. ,WEEE treatment strategies' evaluation using fuzzy LINMAP method, Expert System with Application, 38 (2011), 71-79.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.015

Google Scholar

[4] T.F. Go, D.A. Wahab and M.N. Ab. Rahman, Genetically optimised disassembly sequence for automotive component reuse, Expect Systems with Applications, 39 (2011): 5409-5417.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.11.044

Google Scholar

[5] Bahadir Basdere and Guenther Seliger, Disassembly factories for electrical and electronic products to recover resources in product and material cycles, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 37 (2003), 5354-5362.

DOI: 10.1021/es034555g

Google Scholar

[6] Huisman, J., Stevels, A. and Stobbe, I., Eco-efficiency considerations on the end-of-Life of consumer electronic products, IEEE Transactions on Electronic Packaging and Manufacturing, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/tepm.2004.832214

Google Scholar

[7] Reynaldo, C-R. and Jurgen, E., Reverse logistics network design for the collection of end-of-life vehicles in Mexico, European Journal of Operational Research, 196 (2009), 930–939.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.04.041

Google Scholar

[8] Rahimifard, S., Abu Bakar, M. S. and Williams, D. J., Recycling process planning for the end-of-life management of waste from electrical and electronic equipment, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology (2009), 58, 5-8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.080

Google Scholar

[9] Tseng, H. E., Chang, C. C. and Li, J. D., Modular design to support green lifecycle engineering, Expert Systems with Applications, 34 (2008), 2524-2537.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.04.018

Google Scholar

[10] Wahab, D.A., Designing products in today's global economy: end-of-life issues and challenges, Keynote paper in proceeding of 4th International Seminar on Industrial Engineering and Management (2010).

Google Scholar

[11] Ilgin, M. A. and Gupta, S. M., Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery (ECMPRO): A review of the state of the art, Journal of Environmental Management, 91 (2010), 563-591.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.09.037

Google Scholar

[12] Yu, J. C. and Li, Y. M., Structure representation for concurrent analysis of product assembly and disassembly, Expert Systems with Applications, 31 (2006), 705-714.

DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.01.039

Google Scholar

[13] Dieter, G.E., Engineering Design: A Materials and Processing Approach, McGraw Hill, Singapore (2000).

Google Scholar