Cubic Polynomial Trajectory Planning Algorithm Based on Ideal Drive Force for Aircraft Fusagle Automatic Position and Pose Adjustment

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to ensure the stationarity of the aircraft fusagle automatic adjustment and reduce the fluctuation of the drive force, the redundant actuation optimal algorithm is presented in this paper. Firstly, using Newton-Euler method, the dynamics equations of pose adjustment system are established. Based on the equations, the driving forces can be sovled. Secondly, according to the constraint conditions and pose adjustement process, Cubic Polynomial trajectory planning algorithm is proposed for the aircraft fusagle automatic adjustment. Thirdly, in order to reduce the fluctuation of the drive force, the redundant actuation optimal algorithm is presented. Simulation results show that the presented trajectory planning algorithm has good dynamic characteristics and satisfies engineering requirements. Moreover, the differences between the solutions of optimal algorithm and ideal drive forces are much less than the differences between the minimal norm least square solution and ideal drive forces.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 655-657)

Pages:

1691-1696

Citation:

Online since:

January 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Gary Williams, Edward Chalupa, Steven Rahhal. Automated Positioning and Alignment Systems. Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc, (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] Corbett J, Naing S. Feature based design for jigless assembly[D]. USA, Bedfordshire: Cranfield University, (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] Colm Michael, Mc Keown. Reconfigurable tooling as a enabling technology for the aerospace industry[R]. SAE paper, 2003-01-2941.

DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-2941

Google Scholar

[4] Bernard Ribère. Airbus A340 final assembly by S. O. J. A: semi-automatic orbital fuselage join up robot[R]. SAE paper, 2002 -01-2642.

DOI: 10.4271/2002-01-2642

Google Scholar

[5] Benoit Marguet, Bernard Ribere. Measurement-assisted assembly applications on airbus final assembly lines[R]. SAE paper, 2003 -01- 2950.

DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-2950

Google Scholar

[6] The Boeing Company. Large scale mapping & alignment[R]. Technology application by materials & process technology, (2002).

Google Scholar

[7] Saeed B, Amir K. Time-optimal trajectory planning in cable-based manipulators. IEEE Transaction on Robotics, 2006; 3(22): 559-563.

DOI: 10.1109/tro.2006.870663

Google Scholar

[8] Yiu Y K, Li Z X. PID and adaptive robust control of a 2-DOF over-actuated parallel manipulator for tracking different trajectory. IEEE International Conference on Computation Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Kobe, 2003; 1054-1055.

DOI: 10.1109/cira.2003.1222142

Google Scholar

[9] Shang W W, Cong S. Velocity planning algorithms of parallel manipulator to improve control precision. Journal of University of Science and Technology of China 2006; 36(8): 823-825. [in Chinese].

Google Scholar

[10] Zhang B, Fang Q, Ke Y L. Optimal time trajectory planning method for a kind of posture aligning system of large rigid bodies. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering 2009; 44(8): 250-251. [in Chinese].

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2008.08.248

Google Scholar