Measuring Dynamic Sales Impacts of LBA Using Wireless Communication Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

Because of rapid development of wireless communication technology, there is an increasing adoption of mobile advertising, such as location based advertising (LBA). To what extent can LBA improve advertising effectiveness is an important topic in the field of wireless communication technology research. Most researches quantify long term impacts of advertisings by VAR (Vector Autoregressive) model. However, compared to VAR model, VECM (Vector Error Correction Model) is a better method in that it allows one to estimate both a long-term equilibrium relationship and a short-term dynamic error correction process. In this study, we employ VECM to explore LBA’s (Location Based Advertising) and PUA’s (Pop-up Advertising) sales impact in both short and long terms. The developed VECM reveals that LBA’s sales impact is about more than2 times as big as PUA’s in short dynamic term and nearly 6 times bigger than PUA’s in long equilibrium term. These findings add to advertising and VECM literatures. These results can give managers more confident to apply wireless communication technology to advertising.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

896-901

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Banerjee, S.S. & Dholakia, R.R. 2008. Mobile advertising: does location-based advertising work? International Journal of Mobile Marketing, 3(2), pp: 68-75.

Google Scholar

[2] Boukas, E. 2008. Free-weighting matrices delay-dependent stabilization for systems with time-varying delays. ICIC Express Letters, 2(2), pp: 167-173.

Google Scholar

[3] Bruner II, G.C. & Kumar, A. 2007. Attitude toward location-based advertising. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(2): pp.3-15.

DOI: 10.1080/15252019.2007.10722127

Google Scholar

[4] Engel, R.F. & Granger, C.W. 1987. Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, andTesting. Econometrica, 55, pp: 251-276.

DOI: 10.2307/1913236

Google Scholar

[5] Gidofalvi, G., Larsen, H.R. & Pedersen, T.B. 2008. Estimating the capacity of the Location-Based Advertising channel. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 6(3), pp: 357-375.

DOI: 10.1504/ijmc.2008.017516

Google Scholar

[6] Libai, B., Muller, E. & Peres, R. 2009. The Social Value of Word-of-Mouth Programs: Acceleration versus Acquisition. working paper.

Google Scholar

[7] Nitzan, I. & Barak, L. 2011. Payments as a Virtual Lock-in: Customers' Profitability over Time in the Presence of Payments. In Marketing Science Conference. Houston, Texas.

Google Scholar

[8] Pesaran, H.H. & Shin, Y. 1998. Generalized impulse response analysis in linear multivariate models. Economics letters, 58(1), pp: 17-29.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1765(97)00214-0

Google Scholar

[9] Unni, R. & Harmon, R. 2007. Perceived effectiveness of push vs. pull mobile location-based advertising. Journal of Interactive advertising, 7(2), pp: 28-40.

DOI: 10.1080/15252019.2007.10722129

Google Scholar

[10] Wang, Y. 2008. Fuzzy clustering analysis by using genetic algorithm. ICIC Express Letters, 2(4), pp: 331-337.

Google Scholar

[11] Xu, H. et al. 2009. The role of push-pull technology in privacy calculus: the case of location-based services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), pp: 135-174.

DOI: 10.2753/mis0742-1222260305

Google Scholar