On the Research of Internet Equipment Naming Methods

Abstract:

This paper analyzes the content of Internet naming problems as well as the current exist problems .We discuss the namespace and the major technologies, and then elaborating the important thinking on research of naming problems detailed and propose development direction in the future. In the paper, we propose a new method for devices naming due to the issues that exist in the Internet naming. Using this technical, it can solve the problem of the extremely scarce IPv4 and the IP address changed frequently on Internet devices. Equipment naming scheme has five major components: equipment name registered server, equipment communication server and client domain name server and client communication agency, the client login and configuration. It is a pattern in which the mobile device uses configured client software to issue a request to NG-DNS (new generation domain system).we have analyze on the realization of the key technology on the windows system. It has realized communication among equipments which are mobile, wireless, dynamic IP address, and hidden NAT and firewall. The method can be extended entry of Android devices.

• Periodical: Advanced Materials Research (Volume 664)
• Pages: 1021-1027
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.664.1021
• Online since: February 2013
• Authors: Yu Zhi Xiao
• Keywords: DNS, Dynamic Allocation, Internet Equipment Named, Mobile, NAT, Wireless

References

[1] http: /www. 199it. com/archives/46456. html.

[2] Aboba B, Beadles M, Arkko J, Eronen P. The network access identifier. RFC4282, (2005).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc4282

[3] Mockapetris P. Domain names Concepts and facilities. RFC 1034, (2007).

[4] Vixie,S. Thomson, Y. Rekhter, J. Bound, Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE), RFC 2136, April (1997).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc2136

[5] 64-Bit global identifier format tutorial. http: /standards. ieee. org/regauth/oui/tutorials/EUI64. html.

[6] Nordmark E. Shim6: Level 3 multihoming shim protocol for IPv6. Internet Draft: draft-ietf-shim6-proto-10, (2008).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc5533

[7] Cocker D. Internetworking multiple address service for transport (MAST). In: Proc. of the 2004 Symp. on Applications and the Internet (SAINT 2004). IEEE Computer Society, 2004, 4.

[8] Matt Crawford, Thomas Narten, John W. Stewart, Zhang LX. Separating identifiers and locators in addresses: An analysis of the GSE proposal for IPv6. Internet Draft, draft-ietf-ipngwg-esd-analysis-05, (1999).

[9] Ishiyama M, Kunishi M, Teraoka F. An analysis of mobility handling in LIN6. In: Proc. of the Int'l Symp. on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communication (WPMC). (2001).

[10] Kunishi M, Ishiyama M, Uehara K, Esaki H, Teraoka F. LIN6: A new approach to mobility support in IPv6. In: Proc. of the 3rd Int'l Symp. on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications. (2007).

[11] Masinter L, Mc Cahill M. Uniform resource locators (URL). RFC 1738, (1994).

[12] Lyon J, Wong M. Sender ID: Authenticating e-mail. RFC 4406, (2006).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc4406

[13] Fenton J. Analysis of threats motivating domainkeys identified mail (DKIM). RFC 4686, (2006).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc4686

[14] Nikander P, Laganier J. Host identity protocol (HIP) domain name system (DNS) extensions. RFC 5205, (2008).

DOI: 10.17487/rfc5205

[15] Wu J, Ren G, Li X. Source address validation: Architecture and protocol design. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int'l Conf. on Network Protocols. 2007. 276−283.

DOI: 10.1109/icnp.2007.4375858

[16] Park K, Wang Z, Pai V, Peterson L. CoDNS: Improving DNS performance and reliability via cooperative lookups. In: Proc. of the 6th Symp. on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 2004). Berkeley: USENIX Association, 2004. 14.

[17] Cohen E, Kaplan H. Proactive caching of DNS records: Addressing a performance bottleneck. In: Proc. of the Symp. on Applications and the Internet. San Diego-Mission Valley: Elsevier, 2009. 707−726.

DOI: 10.1016/s1389-1286(02)00424-3