Influence of Substrate Type on the Attachment of Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kütz

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Cladophora genus comprises macro benthic green algae, widely distributed in estuaries, rivers, and lakes around the world. It is often a dominant species and influences environmental and ecological systems. Cladophora is a biological material with great development potential due mainly to its significant biomass and the ease with which it can be harvested. Furthermore, because it can live on various carriers or vectors, the growth conditions of Cladophora can affect the group to which it belongs. To investigate the growth of the Cladophora group in the natural environment, this study endeavored to (1) observe the biomass accumulation of Cladophora glomerata on varying substrates, (2) determine whether substrate roughness has an impact on the attachment of C. glomerata, and (3) identify the relationship between the attachment of pioneer diatoms and C. glomerata. Five types of substrate were selected (glass slide, glazed tile, marble, unglazed tile, and wood) and placed in the natural habitat of C. glomerata, a sub-tropical river. After thirty days, unglazed tile produced the largest biomass of 2332.2 dry weight mg/m2, followed by wood (1744.3 dry weight mg/m2), marble (158.1dry weight mg/m2), glass slide (90.7dry weight mg/m2), and glazed tile(36.3 dry weight mg/m2). The results of this study indicate that the type and roughness of the substrate both influence the attachment of C. glomerata and the subsequent development of its population. The existence of biofilm formed by pioneer diatoms on the substrate is also beneficial to the epiphytic growth of C. glomerata. Moreover, the development of pioneer diatoms is associated with the type of substrate and its silicon content.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

259-264

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B.A. Whitton: Water Research Vol. 4 (1970), p.457–476.

Google Scholar

[2] W.K. Dodds, D.A. Gudder: Journal of Phycology Vol. 28 (1992), p.415–427.

Google Scholar

[3] S.N. Higgins, S.Y. Malkin, E.T. Howell, S.J. Guildford, L. Campbell, V. Hiriart-Baer, R.E. Hecky: Journal of Phycology Vol. 44 (2008), p.839–854.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2008.00538.x

Google Scholar

[4] N. Oertel: Science of The Total Environment Vol. 34(S2) (1993), p.1293–1304.

Google Scholar

[5] Y.C. Lee, S.P. Chang: Bioresource Technology 102 (2011), p.5297–5304.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Mihranyan, S.B. Andersson, R. Ek: European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Vol. 22 (2004), p.279–286.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Gaiser: Ecological Indicators Vol. 9S (2009), p. S37–S45.

Google Scholar

[8] R.P. Barbiero: Hydrobiologia Vol. 438 (2000), p.157–170.

Google Scholar

[9] M.H. Thurman , R.A. Kuehne: Field and Lab. Vol. 20 (1952), p.26–28.

Google Scholar

[10] A. Sousa-Dias, R.A. Melo: Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science Vol. 76 (2008), p.21–28.

Google Scholar

[11] C.G. Wen, M.M. Kao, S.P. Chang, C.S. Lee CS: A study of macroalgae in headwater of reservoir. Final Report, Project No. EPA-95-G107-02-222, EPA of R.O.C., Taipei, Taiwan. ( 2007), p.320.

Google Scholar

[12] K. Kröpfl, P. Vladár, K. Szabó, É Ács, A.K. Borsodi, S. Szikora, S. Caroli, G. Záray: Environmental Pollution Vol. 144 (2006), p.626–631.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.01.031

Google Scholar

[13] R.A. Danilov, N.G.A. Ekelund: Journal of Microbiological Methods Vol. 45(2001), p.167–170.

Google Scholar

[14] APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Am. Pub. Health Assoc., Washington D.C., USA. (1998).

Google Scholar

[15] S.D. Lai: Native benthic algae as bioindicator for water quality of river in Taiwan. Dissertation for Ph.D. of National Chung Hsing Univ., Taichung, Taiwan (1997), p.298.

Google Scholar

[16] P.H. de Paula Silva, S. McBride, R. de Nys, N.A. Paul: Aquaculture Vol. 284 (2008), p.74–80.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.035

Google Scholar

[17] B.P. Guilbeau, F.P. Harry, R.P. Gambrell, F.C. Knopf, K.M. Dooley: Ecological Engineering Vol. 20 (2003), p.309–319.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8574(03)00026-0

Google Scholar

[18] D.M. DeNicola, C.D. McIntire: Journal of Phycology Vol. 26 (1990), p.624–633.

Google Scholar

[19] R.L. Lowe, B.H. Rosen, J.C. Kingston: Journal of Great Lakes Research Vol. 8 (1982), p.164–168.

Google Scholar

[20] M.S. Thomsen: Aquatic Botany Vol. 80 (2004), p.153–161.

Google Scholar