Multi-Criteria Analysis of Material Compositions of External Walls

Article Preview

Abstract:

Intensity of building development increases by growing population and their requirements on living. Buildings belong to the largest energy consumers and greenhouse gases emitters. Current energy strategy of European Union is focused especially on reduction of operational energy of buildings. Although operational energy participates the highest proportion in total energy consumption over whole life cycle of building, it is important to take into account embodied energy. Values of embodied energy and associated emissions grow by improving energy quality of building envelope by using extra components and insulation materials. This paper demonstrates significance of correct selection of materials in order to environmental and energy optimalization of building structures. The designed material compositions of external wall alternatives are evaluated by methodology LCA and also in the view of impact on future energy consumption though thermal-physical parameters. Results of assessments are compared by multi-criteria decision analysis. The optimized alternative achieves very low embodied energy (218 MJ/m2) and high reduction of embodied CO2 (-114 kg CO2eq/m2).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

485-490

Citation:

Online since:

February 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. Asif, T. Muneer and R. Kelley: Building and Environment Vol. 42 (2007), p.1391.

Google Scholar

[2] P. Joseph P. and S. Tretsiakova-McNally: Sustainability Vol. 2 (2010), p.400.

Google Scholar

[3] G. A. Blengini and T. Di Carlo: Energy and Building Vol. 42 (2010), p.869.

Google Scholar

[4] S. G. Krishnakedar: Embodied energy computations in buildings, information on http: /besharp. archidev. org/IMG/pdf/Embodied_Energy_Computations_in_Buildings. pdf.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Rossi B. et al: Building and Environment Vol. 51 (2012), p.395.

Google Scholar

[6] G. Verbeeck and H. Hens: Building and Environment Vol. 45 (2010), p.964.

Google Scholar

[7] N. Huberman and D. Pearlmutter: Energy and Buildings Vol. 40 (2008), p.837.

Google Scholar

[8] B.V. Reddy and K.S. Jagadish: Energy and Buildings Vol. 35 (2003), p.129.

Google Scholar

[9] B. Berge: Ecology of Building Materials (Elsevier, Great Britain and USA, 2009).

Google Scholar

[10] A. Dodoo, L. Gustavsson L. and R. Sathre: Resources, Conservation and Recycling Vol. 53 (2009), p.276.

Google Scholar

[11] A. H Buchanan and S.B. Levine: Environmental Science & Policy Vol. 2 (1999), p.427.

Google Scholar

[12] M.M. Khasreen, P.F.G. Banfill and G.F. Menzies: Sustainability Vol. 1 (2009), p.674.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Waltjen: Passivhaus-Bauteilkatalog, Ökologisch bewertete Konstruktionen (Springer, Austria, 2009).

DOI: 10.1515/9783035607444

Google Scholar

[14] J. Wihnan: Humidity in straw bale walls and its effect (University of East London School of Computing and Technology Londbridge Road, Dagenham, 2001).

Google Scholar

[15] J. Hejhalek: Architecture and Interior Vol. 2 (2001), p.56.

Google Scholar

[16] F. Nemry et al.: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 42 (2010), p.976.

Google Scholar

[17] P. Korviny: Theoretical basis of multi-criteria decision ( Ph.D. Thesis, Czech Republic, 2009. ).

Google Scholar

[18] I.B. Huang, J. Keisler and I. Linkov: Science of The Total Environment Vol. 409 (2011), p.3578.

Google Scholar