The Study on Static Force Behavior of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Lattice Wind Generator Tower Joints

Yang Wen; Fei Zhou

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.671-674.833

Paper Titles

The Finite Element Analysis of Overall Stability of High-Frequency Welded H-Section Steel Beam
p.810

The Finite Element Analysis on Shear-Lag Effect of the Steel Box-Girder
p.815

The Inner Force Analysis of a Long Span Pre-Stressed Multi-Story Building Based on Special Construction Process Requirement
p.823

The Mathematical Model of the Reinforcement Layout of the Making of Hyperbolic Paraboloid Thin Shell Roofs
p.828

The Study on Static Force Behavior of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Lattice Wind Generator Tower Joints
p.833

Yield Surface Applied to Dynamic Elastoplastic Analysis of Frame Structures with Flexibility Method
p.838

Internal Force Calculation of Continuous Beam Considering Torsional Supports
p.843

Nonlinear Numerical Analysis of Transfer Beam Under Complex Situation
p.847

Numerical Analysis on Bending Strength and Ductility of Compact Section I-Girders with HSB800 Steels
p.851

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 671-674The Study on Static Force Behavior of Concrete...

The Study on Static Force Behavior of Concrete Filled Steel Tube Lattice Wind Generator Tower Joints

Abstract:

In order to discuss the failure mechanism of concrete filled steel tube lattice wind generator tower joints. Based on the parameters of web member section form, and using nonlinear static numerical simulation, this dissertation research on the stressed complex joints. The results of the study show that the abdominal rod for circular steel tubes joint (JD1) is instability failure which is led to the local buckling of compressive bar; the abdominal rod for single angle steel (JD2) or double angle steel (JD3) joint is instability failure because of the local buckling of the joint board. Under the web members and joint boards all fitting their own capacity requirements, JD1 is very easy to make draw bar broken on both sides of the pillar tube wall region, JD2 and JD3 are apt to damage on the weak positions of joint board ends and pillar tube wall joint. In the three forms of web member joints, the best ultimate bearing capacity is JD1 , JD3 is the second and JD2 is minimum.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 671-674)

Pages:

833-837

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.671-674.833

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2013

Authors:

Yang Wen, Fei Zhou

Keywords:

Concrete Filled Steel Tubular (CFST), Equivalent Stress, Finite Element, Joint, Tower

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] Gu Fubin. Cui Xinwei. Ma Weibin. Discussion wind generators with structure of concrete tower forms. Xinjiang agricultural university journal [J]. 2009, (3): 82-85.

Google Scholar

[2] Han Zhongzhou. Research mechanical behavior on Lattice three-leg concrete filled steel Tubular column of wind generator tower [D]. Inner Mongolia University of science and technology (2011).

Google Scholar

[3] ChaiChang. Song Manhua. Steel structure design and calculation [M]. Machine press. 2006. 6-10.

Google Scholar

[4] Li Xingrong. Wei Caiang. Steel structure connection joint Design Handbook (Second Edition) [M]. China architecture and building press. 2005. 349-426.

Google Scholar

[5] Han Linhai. Concrete-filled steel tube structure [M]. Beijing Science Press. 2001. 64-74.

Google Scholar