Research on Environmental Materials with Variation of Pollutant and Environmental Factor in Underground Environment

Article Preview

Abstract:

The removal efficiency of pollutant in an enhanced remediation with a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) was studied in this paper. The experimental results showed that the DO value has varied obviously because of the oxidation and reduction near the electrodes, i.e. the pH value near the anode changed from 6.3 to 7.9 but near the cathode it varied from 6.5 to 6.4 in the experiment process, which inflected that the variation content of the DO near anode chamber was bigger than that of the anode chamber during the electrokinetic remediation process. The removal efficiency of Cd was respectively 63.91% near the anode and 86.79% near the cathode, and the removal efficiency of COD was respectively 44.86% near the anode and 90.31% near the cathode at the end of experiment when the experimental voltage gradient was 0.35V/cm, which indicated that this new enhanced electrokinetic remediation of groundwater was more effective method than that of ordinary PRB containing environmental materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

188-191

Citation:

Online since:

March 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhang Xihui, Wang Hui: Advances in Water Science, vol. 12(2001), pp.249-255 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Long Xingxian, Yang Xiaoe, Ni Wuzhong: Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 13(2002), pp.757-762 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Zhou Jiaxiang, Liu Zheng: Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control, vol. 1(2000), pp.52-56 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Shen Zhenguo, Chen Manhuai: Rural Eco-Environment, vol. 16(2000), pp.39-44 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Kim S O, Moon S H, Kim K W: Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 125(2001), pp.259-272.

Google Scholar

[6] Genc A, Chase G, Foos A: Water Air and Soil Pollution, 197(2009), pp.131-141.

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-008-9796-7

Google Scholar

[7] Gidarakos E, Giannis A: Water Air and Soil Pollution, 172(2006), pp.295-312.

Google Scholar

[8] Zhou Dongmei, Cang Long, Deng Changfen: China Environmental Science, vol. 25(2005), pp.10-14(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[9] Cang Long, Zhou Dongmei: Acta Pedologica Sinica, vol. 42(2005), pp.999-1005, (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[10] Wang Yehui: Ecology and Environment, vol. 14(2005), pp.855-859, (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[11] Meng Fansheng, Wang Yehui: Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 28(2005), pp.27-30 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] Lu Xiaocheng,Huang Xingfa, Cheng Jiongjia: Science paper Online, vol. 2(2007), pp.577-581(in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[13] Ding Sa, Luo Yatian: Wuyi Science Journal, vol. 23(2007), pp.53-57 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[14] Meng Fansheng, Wang Yehui: Ground water, vol. 34(2007), pp.96-99 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[15] Yang Xuemei, Fan Junling, Xu Yazhou: Technological development of enterprise, vol. 11 (2009), pp.9-10 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar