Discussion on Modern Coach Station Design

Article Preview

Abstract:

China's transportation is developing rapidly, the design of the modern coach station has changed a lot compared with the traditional coach station. In response to these changes, architecture and structural design was discussed in this paper in order to guide the modern coach station design. In the field of architecture design, large space is often used; the traffic flow develops to three-dimensional mode on the base of planar model; commercial facilities are getting more attention, and architecture modeling design is novel; at the same time, structural design also changes accordingly

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

211-215

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zhang Shengrui, Wang Chaoshen, Wen Zhaokang, Research on Traffic Design of Large Passenger Hub, Journal of Shandong Jiaotong University, 4 (2008) 14-17.

Google Scholar

[2] Zhu Xiaolin, Thought on Changes in the Concept of Modern Transportation Building Design, Architecture Technique, 5 (2005) 54.

Google Scholar

[3] Bruno Zevi, Architecture As Space: How to Look at Architecture, China Building Industry Press, Beijing, 2006.

Google Scholar

[4] Peng Yigang, Architectural space combination theory, China Building Industry Press, Beijing, 1998.

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang Wenzhong, The principle of public architecture design, China Building Industry Press, Beijing, 2005.

Google Scholar

[6] Cai Jun, Zhang Meiqing, Inner Spatial Relationship in Modern Transportation Building with Long Span, Huazhong Architecture, 10 (2008) 106-109

Google Scholar

[7] Fu Yao, Mao Bing, Shen Xinrong, Coach Station Architecture Design, China Building Industry Press, Beijing, 2007.

Google Scholar

[8] Tan Haibin, Xie Qingrong, Steel structure design of Kunming Southern Passenger Bus Station, Building Structure, 5 (2011) 73-77.

Google Scholar