Study on the Environmental Friendliness of Biomass Dishware Based on Life Cycle Assessment

Article Preview

Abstract:

Biomass materials are the best substitute for those made of plastic packaging materials all over the world. Widespread application of these materials can control or eliminate the increase of white pollution problem effectively. In this paper, the analysis model of biomass 450 ml lunch box was established based on Life Cycle Assessment, and then the environment Friendliness of the box, such as resource consumption, environment quality and human health, was analyzed. The results have shown that the resource consumption, environment quality and human health of biomass products were 26.6mPt, 6.23mPt, 16mPt, and these parameters of plastic products were 291mPt, 12.1mPt, 74.1mPt. Therefore, the biomass products have better environmental Friendliness than plastic products.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 690-693)

Pages:

1024-1028

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Farrell A E, Plevin R J, Turner B T, et al. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals[J]. Science, 2006,311(5760):506-508.

DOI: 10.1126/science.1121416

Google Scholar

[2] Lang A, Kopetz H, Parker A. Biomass energy holds big promise[J]. NATURE, 2012, 488(7413): 590-591.

DOI: 10.1038/488590d

Google Scholar

[3] Mohee R, Unmar G D, Mudhoo A, et al. Biodegradability of biodegradable/degradable plastic materials under aerobic and anaerobic conditions[J]. Waste Management, 2008, 28(9): 1624-1629.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.07.003

Google Scholar

[4] Kyrikou I, Briassoulis D. Biodegradation of agricultural plastic films: A critical review[J]. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 2007,15(2):125-150.

DOI: 10.1007/s10924-007-0053-8

Google Scholar

[5] Unmar G, Mohee R. Assessing the effect of biodegradable and degradable plastics on the composting of green wastes and compost quality[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(15): 6738-6744.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.01.016

Google Scholar

[6] Jarimopas B, Sayasoonthorn S, Singh S P, et al. Test method to evaluate bruising during impacts to apples and compare cushioning materials[J]. JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2007,35(3):321-326.

DOI: 10.1520/jte100584

Google Scholar

[7] Chonhenchob V, Singh S P. Packaging performance comparison for distribution and export of papaya fruit[J]. PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2005,18(3):125-131.

DOI: 10.1002/pts.681

Google Scholar

[8] Ravichandran S, Bouldin R M, Kumar J, et al. A renewable waste material for the synthesis of a novel non-halogenated flame retardant polymer[J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011,19(5SI):454-458.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.09.010

Google Scholar

[9] Wang D M. Cushioning Properties of Multi-layer Corrugated Sandwich Structures[J]. JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS, 2009,11(1):57-66.

DOI: 10.1177/1099636208100415

Google Scholar

[10] Ashby M F. The properties of foams and lattices[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2006,364(1838):15-30.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2005.1678

Google Scholar

[11] Lui W B, Peng J Y. Effects of die shapes and additives on the physical and mechanical properties, and cellular structure of biodegradable cushioning extruded foams[J]. JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PLASTICS, 2005,41(5):437-455.

DOI: 10.1177/0021955x05056961

Google Scholar

[12] Hoffmann J. Compression and cushioning characteristics of moulded pulp packaging[J]. Packaging Technology and Science, 2000,13(5):211-220.

DOI: 10.1002/1099-1522(200009)13:5<211::aid-pts515>3.0.co;2-0

Google Scholar

[13] Ozturk U E, Anlas G. Finite element analysis of expanded polystyrene foam under multiple compressive loading and unloading[J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2011,32(2):773-780.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.07.025

Google Scholar

[14] Lui W B, Peng J C. Effects of composition levels on the cellular structure and the thermal properties of biodegradable cushioning extrudates[J]. JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PLASTICS, 2004,40(6):445-459.

DOI: 10.1177/0021955x04048420

Google Scholar

[15] Silva D A L, Santos Renó G W, Sevegnani G, et al. Comparison of disposable and returnable packaging: a case study of reverse logistics in Brazil[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, (0).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.057

Google Scholar

[16] Guo A, Li J, Li F, et al. Study on the biodegradagility of plant fiber and starch dishware[J]. Gongneng Cailiao/Journal of Functional Materials, 2009,40(11):1929-1932.

Google Scholar

[17] Guo A, Lu H, Li J, et al. Mechanical property simulation and verification of plant fiber and starch dishware[J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2010,26(7):91-95.

Google Scholar

[18] Guo A, Li J, Li F, et al. Research on the four-step foam forming mechanism of biomass materials[J]. Gongneng Cailiao/Journal of Functional Materials, 2012,43(SUPPL. 1):54-58.

Google Scholar

[19] Institute T. Defining Life cycle Assessment [EB/OL]. http://www.gdrc.org/uem/lca/ lca-define.html.

Google Scholar