A Universal Feature Definition Frame for 3-D CAD Model Conversion

Article Preview

Abstract:

Data exchange between 3-D CAD systems has a very important research value both in theory and in application. This paper presents a general outline of a Universal Feature Definition (UFD) frame, which provides universal support for todays 3-D CAD systems. Through the medium of UFD feature, this frame can realize the conversion of 3-D CAD models from source system to target system according to API mapping. This CAD model conversion method may overcome the disadvantage of traditional geometric method that the target model is not editable. This frame also provides the conversion interface of user defined features, which is convenient for the user to customize the desired conversion process. The frame has been implemented between Catia and UG with successful results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 690-693)

Pages:

2781-2786

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ari Rappoport. An architecture for universal CAD data exchange. Solid Modeling '03, ACM Press, pp.266-269.

Google Scholar

[2] Ari Rappoport. The Universal Product Representation (UPR) Architecture for CAD Data Exchange. Technical Report, 2003.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Susan Bloor, Jon Owen. Product Data Exchange. UCL Press, University College London, Gower Street, London, 1995.

Google Scholar

[4] Michael J. Pratt, Bill D. Andersonb. A shape modeling applications programming interface for the STEP standard. Computer-Aided Design 33 (2001): 531-543.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(01)00052-5

Google Scholar

[5] Christoph M. Homanna, Robert Juanb. Erep-An editable,high-level representation for geometric design and analysis. Geometric and Product Modeling, North Holland, 1993, pp.129-164.

Google Scholar

[6] Chia-Hui Shih, Bill Anderson. A design/constraint model to capture design intent. Solid Modeling '97, ACM Press, 1997, pp.255-264,.

DOI: 10.1145/267734.267802

Google Scholar

[7] Christoph M. Homanna. On the semantics of generative geometry representations. 19th ASME Design Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, September 1993.

Google Scholar