Comparison of Two Six-Bar Mechanisms Based on Simulation for Optimization

Kun Lv; Yang Yuan; Wei Huang; Dong Guo

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.237

Paper Titles

Size Effect on Natural Frequency of Cantilever Micro-Beams Based on a Modified Couple Stress Theory
p.221

The Theoretical Analysis of Chain Drive System for Heavy Duty Apron Feeder
p.225

The Planetary Vibroexciter with Elliptic Inner Race
p.229

A Study on Co-Simulation for Rotating Mechanism of Bogie Separation Device Based on ADAMS/MATLAB
p.233

Comparison of Two Six-Bar Mechanisms Based on Simulation for Optimization
p.237

Dynamical Analysis of Automobile Based on Principle of Optimal-Power Shift
p.242

Feasibility Design of Derrick Anchor Pile Piling Position Based on ANSYS Optimization
p.246

The Dynamic Simulation Research of Multi-Joint Robot Based on ADAMS
p.251

Study on Tooth Profile of Silent Chain Based on Friction Reducing
p.255

HomeAdvanced Materials ResearchAdvanced Materials Research Vols. 694-697Comparison of Two Six-Bar Mechanisms Based on...

Comparison of Two Six-Bar Mechanisms Based on Simulation for Optimization

Abstract:

To make a six-bar mechanism of shaper to be more reasonable, at first, the geometrical models of a couple of mechanisms were created by the ADAMS and the kinematical analysis on the models was carried out. The simulation results reveal the regulation that the displacement, velocity and acceleration of plough head of shaper vary with time. Through comparing the movement charts, we can not only gain the performance parameters of the mechanisms, but also evaluate more comprehensively the performance of a shaper. Then through parameterized modeling, how the length change of each rod of the mechanism to affect its performance was analyzed. Taking the minimization of mechanism maximum pressure angle and acceleration as the objective function, the optimal design of mechanism was implemented. This method to use ADAMS to conduct simulation and optimization greatly improves research efficiency and shortens product development cycle.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 694-697)

Pages:

237-241

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.694-697.237

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2013

Authors:

Kun Lv, Yang Yuan, Wei Huang, Dong Guo

Keywords:

Comparison, Optimization, Simulation, Six-Bar Mechanism

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] X.R. Li and X.Z. Zheng: Sponsored by China Construction Machinery, Vol. 5 (2007) No.4, p.437.

Google Scholar

[2] D. G. Chang, H. Li, Z. J. Xiao and H.Chen:2009 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation—ICICTA2009 (IEEE Computer Society, 2009).

Google Scholar

[3] L.Wang, L.Qin and W.P. Ruan:Journal of Mechanical Tranamission,Vol.35(2011)No.01,p.59.

Google Scholar

[4] C.Y.Yi, R.L. Zhong and X.A. Cao:China Mechanical Engineering,Vol.12(2008)No.10,p.1184.

Google Scholar

[5] R.Mi and G.F. Ding:Machine Design & Research, Vol.26(2010)No.1,p.31.

Google Scholar

[6] F.P. Yang and Q.Sun:Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering,Vol.26(2 007)No.9,p.1151.

Google Scholar

[7] D.M. Chen C.F. Huai and K.T. Zhang:Proficient in ADAMS2005/2007 Virtual Prototype Technology (Chemical Industry Press, China 2010),p.3.

Google Scholar

[8] K.Lv, Y.Yuan, D.Guo and L.Wang: Key Engineering Materials, Vol.522(2012),p.476.

Google Scholar