Transformation of Pure Al Structure under the Influence of Electromagnetic Field

Article Preview

Abstract:

In paper problem concerning inoculation of primary structure of aluminum with purity of 99,5% and 99,8%, which is realized mainly by intensification of liquid metal movement in mould is presented. In aim of realization of forced movement during the crystallization of liquid metal was used rotating electromagnetic field produced by the induction coil supplied by current with elevated frequency. The degree of structure refinement was represented by equiaxed crystals zone content on transverse section of ingot and average area of macro-grain in this zone. Effect of structure refinement obtained by influence of electromagnetic field was compared with refinement obtained by use of traditional inoculation, which consists in introducing of additives i.e. titanium, boron and carbon to metal bath. The results of studies and their analysis show possibility of effective refinement of pure Al primary structure, only with use of rotating electromagnetic field and without necessity of application of inoculants such a Ti, B and C. This method of inoculation is important, because inoculants decrease the degree of purity and electrical conductivity of pure Al. Moreover Ti and B are reason of point cracks formation during rolling of ingots.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

159-164

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Chalmers: Journal of the Australian Institute of Metals Vol. 8 (1963), p.255.

Google Scholar

[2] A. Ohno: The solidification of metals (Chijin Shokan Co. Ltd, Japan 1976).

Google Scholar

[3] E. Fraś: Crystallization of metals (WNT, Poland 2003).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Szajnar and T. Wróbel: Journal of Manufacturing Processes Vol. 10 (2008), p.74.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Guzowski, G. Sigworth and D. Sentner: Metall. Mater. Trans. A. Vol. 18 (1987), p.603.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Hu and H. Li: J. Mater. Process. Tech. Vol. 74 (1998), p.56.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Kashyap and T. Chandrashekar: B. Mater. Sci. Vol. 24 (2001), p.345.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Janerka, D. Bartocha, J. Szajnar and J. Jezierski: Arch. Metall. Mater. Vol. 55 (2010), p.851.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Jezierski and K. Janerka: Pol. J. Environ. Stud. Vol. 20 (2011), p.101.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Szajnar and T. Wróbel: Int. J. Mater. Prod. Tech. Vol. 33 (2008), p.322.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Doherty, H. Lee and E. Feest: Mater. Sci. Eng. Vol. 65 (1984), p.181.

Google Scholar

[12] W. Griffiths and D. McCartney: Mat. Sci. Eng. A – Struct. Vol. 222 (1997), p.140.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Campanella, C. Charbon and M. Rappaz: Metall. Mater. Trans. A. Vol. 35 (2004), p.3201.

Google Scholar

[14] O. Keles and M. Dundar: J. Mater. Process. Tech. Vol. 186 (2007), p.125.

Google Scholar