Numerical Modeling of Galvanic Corrosion Behaviors on Uranium Surface

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Uranium and Titanium corrosion rates are described by a Tafel’s relationship, and the cathodic protection of Uranium is a function of a Wagner number. A numerical simulation of galvanic corrosion of Uranium surface under thin layer electrolyte is presented. The model considered that the effect of a circular defect and oxygen reduction and corrosion in the Uranium surface, the effect of electrolyte thickness and conductivity and defect radius on corrosion current distribution of Uranium with is investigated. The results shows that the corrosion rate at the center is non-uniform, and it could lead to the formation of a hemispherical-shaped pit. And the effect of radius is to increase the importance of the electrode kinetics relative to ohmic resistance, and to increase the potential difference between the center and edge of the Uranium surface, resulting in non-uniform corrosion current distribution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

140-144

Citation:

Online since:

May 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Q. F. WANG, Q. H. LIU, L. CHEN, et al. Anti-corrosion Performance of Titanium Deposit on Depleted Uranium Surface. Raremetal Materals and Engineering, 2012, 41(3): 494-497.

Google Scholar

[2] Kiran B. Deshpande. Numerical modeling of micro-galvanic corrosion. Electrochimical Acta, 2011, 56: 1737-1745.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.09.044

Google Scholar

[3] X. G. Zhang, E. M. Valeriote. Influence of the electrolyte thickness to galvanic current of an Al/iron couple. Corrosion Science, 1993, 34: 1957-1960.

Google Scholar

[4] G. L. SONG. Potential and current distributions of one-dimensional galvanic corrosion systems. Corrosion Science, 2009, 52: 455-480.

DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.10.003

Google Scholar

[5] B. T. XIONG, W. C. YANG, W. H. LUO, et al. Theoretical modeling of Uranium surface corrosion at initial stage. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2011, 39(Suppl): 146-150.

Google Scholar

[6] R. Montoya, M. L. Escudero, M. C. Garcia Alonso. Effect of impurities and electrolyte thickness on degradation of pure magnesium: A finite elements study. Materials Science and Engineering B, 2011, 176: 1807-1811

DOI: 10.1016/j.mseb.2011.03.016

Google Scholar

[7] Eiji Tada, Satomi Satoh,Hiroyyuki Kaneko. The spatial distribution of Zn2+ during galvanic corrosion of a Zn/steel couple. Electrochimica Acta, 2004, 49: 2279-2285.

DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2004.01.008

Google Scholar

[8] John M. Haschke. Corrosion of Uranium in air and water vapor: consequences for environmental dispersal. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 1998, 278 (2): 149-160.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-8388(98)00639-2

Google Scholar

[9] M. Stratmann, H. Streckel, K.T. Kim, S. Crockett, Corrosion Science, 1990, 30: 715-719.

Google Scholar

[10] V. F. Peretrukhin, A. G. Maslennikov, A. Yu, Tsivadze. Corrosion of Uranium and Its Low Content Zr, Nb, and Ru Alloys in Aqueous Solutions. Protection of Metals, 2008, 44(3): 211-232.

DOI: 10.1134/s0033173208030016

Google Scholar