Detecting Store Review Spammer via Review Relationship

Article Preview

Abstract:

Online review can help people getting more information about store or product. The potential customers tend to making decision according to it. However, driven by profit and fame, spammers post spurious reviews to mislead the customers by promoting or demoting target store. Previous studies mainly focused on the text features of the reviews. However, these studies ignore the importance of relationship between store and reviewer. This paper first proposes a novel concept of store robustness which means the degree that store resist the influence of spamming. Then which types of store the spammer prefer to choose to gain larger influence is discussed. The proposed method use store-reviewer relationship combined with deviation degree to calculate the spamicity (degree of spam) of reviews. A subset of highly suspicious reviewers is selected for evaluation by human judges. Experimental results show that the proposed method can find out the harmful store review spammer efficiently.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 718-720)

Pages:

2153-2158

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jindal, N., Chang, B. Liu.: Review Spam Detection, WWW 2007, Banff, Alberta, Canada

Google Scholar

[2] Jindal, N., Liu, B., Lim, E.P.: Finding Unusual Review Patterns using Unexpected Rules, CIKM (2010)

Google Scholar

[3] Lim, E. P., Nguyen, V.A., Jindal, N., Liu, B., Lauw, H. W.: Finding Unusual Review Patterns using Unexpected Rules, CIKM (2010)

Google Scholar

[4] Wang, G., Xie, S., Liu, B., Philip, S.Y.: Identify Online Store Review Spammers via Social Review Graph, ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, Volume 3 Issue 4, September 2012 Article No. 61

DOI: 10.1145/2337542.2337546

Google Scholar

[5] Arjun Mukherjee, Bing Liu, Natalie Glance.: Spotting Fake Reviewer Groups in Consumer Reviews, WWW (2012)

Google Scholar

[6] Rong Zhang, ChaoFeng Sha, Minqi Zhou, Aoying Zhou.: Exploiting shopping and reviewing behavior to re-score online evaluations, WWW (2012)

DOI: 10.1145/2187980.2188171

Google Scholar

[7] Ravi Kant, Srinivasan H. Sengamedu, Krishnan S. Kumar.: Comment spam detection by sequence mining, WSDM (2012)

Google Scholar

[8] Fangtao Li, Minlie Huang, Yi Yang, Xiaoyan Zhu.: Learning to identify review spam, IJCAI (2011)

Google Scholar

[9] Myle Ott, Yejin Choi, Claire Cardie, Jeffrey T. Hancock.: Finding deceptive opinion spam by any stretch of the imagination, HLT (2011)

Google Scholar

[10] Rong Zhang, ChaoFeng Sha, Minqi Zhou, Aoying Zhou.: Exploiting shopping and reviewing behavior to re-score online evaluations, WWW (2012)

DOI: 10.1145/2187980.2188171

Google Scholar

[11] Guangyu Wu, Derek Greene, Barry Smyth, Pádraig Cunningham.: Distortion as a validation criterion in the identification of suspicious reviews, SOMA (2010)

DOI: 10.1145/1964858.1964860

Google Scholar

[12] Fleiss, J.L., Cohen, J.: The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability, Educational and psychological measurement

DOI: 10.1177/001316447303300309

Google Scholar

[13] Edwin M. Knorr, Raymond T.NG.: A unified Notion of Outlier: Properties and Computation, KDD (1997)

Google Scholar