Effect of Test Mode on Stress Sensitivity Evaluation of Full-Diameter Volcanic Rock

Article Preview

Abstract:

some reservoir property change which occurs during reservoir development has been studied, however, the study about the effect of test mode on stress sensitivity evaluation of full-diameter volcanic rock is few since the volcanic gas reservoir in Da-qing is buried deeply and the properties and flow mechanics are extremely complex. Therefore, there are two different test modes for stress sensitivity to study the effect of test mode on stress sensitivity evaluation. One of the test modes is to keep the internal pressure constant and change the confining pressure and the other is to change the internal pressure and keep the confining pressure constant. The study results are as follows: (a) the permeabilitys variation law at different test mode is similar when the net stress varies. There are two type, one is sensitive with high permeability since for well development of micro-fracture and pore connectivity, the other is not sensitive with high permeability since for the weak pore connectivity and micro-fracture; (b) the permeability could decrease with times of pressure cycling , so, the times of flow/shut in operation should be decreased as few as possible; (c) the relative variation of permeability in the mode of changing confining pressure is smaller than it in changing internal pressure, which means the stress sensitivity of changing confining pressure is weaker; (d) the results of changing internal pressure should be used since the test mode is more similar with the actual operation. The results are significant for gas-water RPs accurate determination and efficient development of volcanic reservoirs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 718-720)

Pages:

525-531

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Fatt, I., the Effect of Overburden Pressure on Relative Permeability. Trans., AIME(1958), 198: 325~326

Google Scholar

[2] Vairogs, J.,Hearn, C.N. Dareing, D.W.,and Rhoades, V.W. Effect of Rock Stress on Gas Production from Low-permeability Reservoirs. JPT., Sept., 1971:1161~1167

DOI: 10.2118/3001-pa

Google Scholar

[3] Thomas, R.D.and Ward, D.C. Effect of Overburden Pressure and Water on Gas permeability of Tight Sandtone Cores. JPT., February,1972:120~124

DOI: 10.2118/3634-pa

Google Scholar

[4] Chen Zuan;Wu Xiangyang;Sun Deming;Yang Wei. STUDY ON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEKMEABILITY OF SANDSTONE AND HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE. CHINESE JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING,1995,14(2):155~159

Google Scholar

[5] Zhao Mingyue,Wang Xinhai,Lei Ting, et.al. Study on Sensitivity to Pressure on Reservoir Factors. Well Testing,2001,(8):33~36

Google Scholar

[6] YANG Zhengming, PENG Caizhen, HUO Lingjing,et.al. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON STRESS SENSITIVITY FOR VOLCANIC GAS RESERVOIR. Natural Gas Exploration and Development,2011,34(1): 29-31

Google Scholar

[7] Fan Zhaowei, Yang Shenglai, Wang Yuxia, Deng Hui. Permeability stress sensitivity of volcanic gas reservoir with high CO2 content [J]. Block Oil & Gas Field,2010,17(1): 57-60

Google Scholar

[8] ZHU Hua-yin,HU Yong,HAN Yong-xin,SHAO Rui,YANG Gui-mei. STUDY ON STRESS SENSITIVITY OF DEEP VOLCANIC RESERVOIRS IN DAQING. Natural Gas Geoscience,2007,18(2): 197-199

Google Scholar

[9] YANG Man-ping, et al. Analysis of stress sensitivity for volcanic rock reservoir. , Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2004,23(2): 19-20

Google Scholar