Effect of Flue Gas Pollution Control Devices on Mercury Emission from Coal-Fired Power Plants

Article Preview

Abstract:

Coal-fired power plant is one of the largest sources of mercury emitted into the atmosphere artificially. In the paper, more intensive investigations were performed in 27 power plants for observing distribution of mercury at all the effluents. Mass balance of mercury was figured out from the emission data and analysis results of mercury at all the in- and out-streams. The results show that, concentrations of mercury emitted from stack gas equipped with air pollution control devices (APCDs) range between 0.6734 and 14.4312μg/m3 with coal mercury content lower than 0.20mg/kg. FGD gypsum mercury is about 2~10 times as that of in coal. The average mercury removal efficiency by ESP is only about 29.36% while ESP +wFGD and dry-FGD+FF about 68.72% and 81.51% separately. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the existing APCDs, wash and mix coal to Hg co-removal for coal-fired power plants.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

2160-2164

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gildemeister AE, Graney J, Keeler GJ. Source Proximity Reflected in Spatial and Temporal Variability in Particle and Vapor Phase Hg concentrations in Detroit, MI. Atmos Environ. Vol. 39(2005), 353–358.

DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.052

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http://www.nea.gov.cn.

Google Scholar

[3] U.S. EPA, Control of Mercury Emitted from Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers, EPA/600/R-01/109 (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] U.S. EPA, Characterization and Management of Residues from Coal-Fired Power Plant (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] U.S. EPA, Mercury Study Report to Congress, Volume VIII, EPA-452/R-97-010 (1997).

Google Scholar

[6] Ren Deyi, Zhao Fenghua, Dai Shifeng, etc. Geochemistry of Trace Elements in Coal. chapter, 5, Science Press(2006).

Google Scholar

[7] Standard Test Method for Elemental, Oxidized, Particle-Bound and Total Mercury in Flue Gas Generated from Coal-Fired Stationary Sources (Ontario Hydro Method) [S]. ASTM D6784-02. 2008.

DOI: 10.1520/d6784-16

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http://www.epa.gov.

Google Scholar

[9] D. Laudal, T. Brown, B. Nott, Effects of Flue Gas Constituents on Mercury Speciation, Fuel Processing Technology 65-66 (2000), 157–165.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00083-1

Google Scholar

[10] S.Miller,G.Dunham, E.Olson, T. Brown, Flue Gas Effects on a Carbon-Based Mercury Sorbent, Fuel Processing Technology 65-66 (2000), 343–363.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3820(99)00103-4

Google Scholar

[11] S. Sjostrom, J. Bustard, M. Durham, R. Chang, Mercury removal trends in full-scale ESPs and fabric filters, The Mega Symposium—The AWMA Specialty Conference on Mercury Emissions: Fate Effects, and Control, Chicago, Illinois, August 20–23 2001.

Google Scholar

[12] James C. Howe, Constance L. Senior, Eric M. Suuberg, etc. Mercury Capture by Native Fly Ash Carbons in Coal-Fired Power Plants. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science Vol.36(2010), 510–529.

DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2009.12.003

Google Scholar

[13] Shunlin Tang, Xinbin Feng, Jianrong Qiu, etc. Mercury Speciation and Emissions from Coal Combustion in Guiyang, Southwest China. Environmental Research 105 (2007) 175–182.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2007.03.008

Google Scholar

[14] R. Meij, L.H.J. Vredendregt, H.Winkel, Fate and Behavior of Mercury in Coal-Fired Power Plants, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association Vol52 (2002), 912–917.

DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2002.10470833

Google Scholar

[15] SHI ying-jie, DENG ShuangZHANG Fan, etc. Study on Mercury Distribution Characters from a Power Plant Burning High Ash and Sulfur Coal. The 14th Annual Meeting of China Association for Science and Technology. 9.8-10(2012)

Google Scholar

[16] K.S. Park, Y.-C. Seo, S.J. Lee, etc. Emission and Speciation of Mercury from Various Combustion Sources; Powder Technology; Vol.180 (2008), 151-156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2007.03.006

Google Scholar

[17] C. Richardson, T. Machalek, S. Miller, C. Dene, R. Chang, Effect of NOx Control Process on Mercury Speciation in Utility Flue Gas, Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association. Vol.52 (2002), 941–947.

DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2002.10470835

Google Scholar