Soybean Whey Treatment with an Air Sparging Ultrafiltration System

Article Preview

Abstract:

A pilot study was carried out to evaluate the incorporation of air sparging for enhancing ultrafiltration membrane filterability in treating soybean whey. The results showed that the decline of membrane permeate flux was slowed down by air sparging. The filtration could continue for 1200 minutes with acceptable permeate flux under the optimal parameters as temperature of 45°C, pH of 7.0, transmembrane pressure (TMP) of 0.05MPa and air sparging intensity of 5.0m3/h. The experiment also revealed that air sparging was advantageous to hydrodynamic flushing and chemical cleaning to reclaim membrane permeate flux. Moreover, the effect of air sparging on the retaining ratios of protein and sugar was investigated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

2823-2828

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Lv, Li Liu, X. Wang: Study on the treatment of soybean whey wastewater with membrane technology. Journal of Harbin university of commerce (Natural Sciences Eedition). 2002,18(6):647-650.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Yu, X. Wen, Q. Bu, and H. Xia: Critical Flux Enhancements with Air Sparging in Axial Hollow Fibers Cross-Flow Microfiltration of Biologically Treated Wastewater. J. Membr. Sci., 224, 69 (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2003.07.001

Google Scholar

[3] C. Psoch, and S. Schiewer: Long-Term Study of an Intermittent Air Sparged MBR for Synthetic Wastewater Treatment. J. Membr. Sci., 260, 56 (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.03.021

Google Scholar

[4] K.J. Hwang, Ling Chen; Effect of air-sparging on the cross-flow microfiltration of microbe/protein bio-suspension. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 41 (2010) 564–569

DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2009.12.005

Google Scholar

[5] G. Raja: Enhancement of membrane permeability by gas-sparging in submerged hollow fibre ultrafiltration of macromolecular solutions: Role of module design. Journal of Membrane Science 274 (2006) 73–82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.08.002

Google Scholar

[6] A. Drews, H. Prieske, E.L. Meyer, G. Senger, M. Kraume: Advantageous and detrimental effects of air sparging in membrane filtration: Bubble movement, exerted shear and particle classification, Desalination 250 (2010) 1083–1086

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.113

Google Scholar

[7] K.J. Hwang, C.E. Hsu: Effect of gas–liquid flow pattern on air-sparged cross-flow microfiltration of yeast suspension. Chemical Engineering Journal 151 (2009) 160–167

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.009

Google Scholar

[8] G. Guglielmi, D. Chiarani, S.J. Judd, G. Andreottola: Flux criticality and sustainability in a hollow fibre submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 289 (2007) 241–248

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.12.004

Google Scholar

[9] C.C.V. Chan, P.R. Bérubé, E.R. Hall: Shear profiles inside gas sparged submerged hollow fiber membrane modules. Journal of Membrane Science, 297 (2007) 104–120

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.03.032

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Lu, Z. Ding, L. Liu, Z. Wang, R. Ma: The influence of bubble characteristics on the performance of submerged hollow fiber membrane module used in microfiltration. Separation and Purification Technology 61 (2008) 89–95

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.019

Google Scholar

[11] P. Qi, S.H. Lv: Soy protein wastewater treatment and resource reclamation with ultrafiltration. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology. 2005, 37(8): 1138-1141.

Google Scholar

[12] D. James, H. Seungkwan and T. James: Fouling Behavior of a Pilot Scale Inside-out Hollow Fiber UF Membrane during Dead-end Filtration of Tertiary Wastewater. J Membrane Science. 191(2001): 165~178.

DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00455-0

Google Scholar

[13] J.H.J.M. Van der Graff, J.F. Kramer: Experiments on Membrane Filtration of Effluent at Wastewater Treatment Plants in the Netherlands. Water Sci Tech. 1999, 39(5): 203~210.

Google Scholar