The Soil and Vegetation Effect on Carbon Transfer Path in Epigenic Karst System

Article Preview

Abstract:

It was proved that karst processing during groundwater cycle is one of carbon sinks to the atmosphere CO2. To understand the carbon transfer path among the three phases of air, carbonate rocks and karst groundwater in epigenic karst system is very important for mechanic studies of karst carbon sink. There are 8 carbon stable isotope sample sites, including 5 groundwater sites and 3 gaseous CO2 sites in Banzhai river catchment. The total 41 samples, including 38 karst water samples and 3 CO2 samples are acquired in a whole hydrological year of 2010. 4 couples CO2 partial pressure including free air and soil air are tested in site. Based on analysis the carbon stable isotope and CO2 partial pressure data above, it is found that the mostly carbon in free air and karst water is from soil air. The carbon transfer path in epigenic karst system can be divided into 4 steps: 1 the photosynthesis of vegetation take CO2 from free air; 2 the respiration of plant roots and decomposition of humic substance release CO2 to soil layer; 3 the gaseous CO2 is transfer to liquid HCO3- negion by karst process during the water cycle; 4 the bicarbonate in groundwater move to river or ocean fellow the groundwater flow. The forest and soil takes a booster pump action increasing the CO2 partial pressure from free air to soil and it is very important in karst process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

3732-3736

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.A. King, Science, 303 (2004) 176-177.

Google Scholar

[2] I.A. Shiklomanov, World fresh water resources, in: P.H. Gleick (Ed.) Water in Crisis: A Guide to the World's Freshwater resources, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993, pp.13-24.

Google Scholar

[3] Z. Liu, W. Dreybrodt, H. Wang, Earth-Science Reviews, 99 (2010) 162-172.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Blum, C. Gazis, A. Jacobson, C. Page Chamberlain, Geology, 26 (1998) 411-414.

Google Scholar

[5] I.D. Clark, P. Fritz, Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology, Taylor & Francis LLC, New York, 1997.

Google Scholar

[6] G. Han, Y. Tang, Q. Wu, Environmental Earth Sciences, 60 (2010) 893-899.

Google Scholar

[7] P. Gombert, Global and Planetary Change, 33 (2002) 177-184.

Google Scholar

[8] Z. Jiang, D. Yuan, Episodes, 22 (1999) 33-35.

Google Scholar

[9] J.R. O'Neil, Reviews of Mineralogy, 16 (1986) 561–570.

Google Scholar

[10] W.G. Mook, Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 20 (1986) 211-223.

Google Scholar

[11] N. Goldscheider, D. Drew, Methods in Karst Hydrogeology, Taylor & Francis, New York, 2007.

Google Scholar