Rain Fall Partition of the Forest Canopy beside Songhua River

Article Preview

Abstract:

Through field investigation and room experiment, the characteristics of the rainfall partition in the canopy layer of six forest types beside Songhua River were studied. The canopy interception of the rainfall was different in six forest types; from maximum to minimum was Quercus monglica forest, Pinus koraiensis plantation, Tilia mandshurica forest, Fraxinus mandshurica-Larix olgensis forest, Fraxinus mandshurica-Populus davidiana forest and Juglans mandshurica forest. There were significant linear correlation between through fall and precipitation and significant exponential correlation between canopy interception and precipitation in studied forest types; The stem flow ratio to gross rain fall ranged from 0.74% to 16.61% in six forest types, from maximum to minimum was Juglans mandshurica forest, Quercus monglica forest, Pinus koraiensis plantation, Fraxinus mandshurica-Larix olgensis forest, Fraxinus mandshurica-Populus davidiana forest and Tilia mandshurica Forest. In the same precipitation condition, the stem flow ratio to gross rain fall should be affected negatively by canopy size.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

4307-4310

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Jiang HY, Zhao YS, Xin XJ and Ma WH: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol.22 No.6 (2008), pp.197-201 (in Chinese with English summary)

Google Scholar

[2] Shi ZJ, Wang YH, Xu LH, Xiong W, Yu PT and Guo H: Acta Ecologica Sinica. Vol. 29 No.1 (2009), pp.76-84 (in Chinese with English summary)

Google Scholar

[3] He CQ, Xue JH, Wu YB, Zhang LY, Liu C and Liu X L: Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology. Vol.19 No.9 (2008), pp.1871-1876 (in Chinese with English summary)

Google Scholar

[4] Wang YM: Journal of Northwest Forestry University. Vol.15 No.3 (2000), pp.1-7 (in Chinese with English summary)

Google Scholar

[5] Wang YM: Journal of Northwest Forestry University. Vol.15 No.4 (2000), pp.1-5 (in Chinese with English summary)

Google Scholar

[6] Fang JP, Xiang WH and Liu SH: Acta Ecologica Sinica. Vol.30 No.14 (2010), pp.3679-3687 (in Chinese with English summary)

Google Scholar

[7] Hynes RW, Graham RT and Thomas MQ: Journal of forestry. Vol. 96 No.6 (1998), pp.4-9

Google Scholar

[8] Zhou ZF, Zhang GC, Liu X, Bo JY and Li XL: Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. Vol.18 No.3 (2004), pp.137-140, 145(in Chinese with English summary)

Google Scholar

[9] Dwire KA and Kauffman JB: Forest ecology and management. Vol.17 No.8 (2003), pp.61-74

Google Scholar

[10] Blinn, CR and Kilgore MA: Journal of Forestry. Vol. 99 No. 8 (2001), pp.11-17.

Google Scholar