Shifts of Sexual Reproductive and Vegetative Growth Allocation in Stipa grandis along a Climate Gradient in Inner Mongolia Steppe

Article Preview

Abstract:

Trade-off between vegetative growth and reproduction is an important plant adaptive strategy to environmental variability. The study investigated the Stipa grandis resource allocation and the relationship between its sexual reproduction and climate factors among three sites located along a typical environmental gradient in the Inner Mongolian Plateau. The results show that different climatic characteristics among three habitats cause the growth differentiation of S. grandis. S. grandis exhibits a prominent change on the resource allocation patterns. The number of reproductive tillers and panicles biomass allocation are significantly increased along the gradient of water availability and temperature whereas the number of vegetative tillers and root biomass allocation are reduced. The rate of the percentage increase is prominently reduced although the foliage allocation increased. It suggests that under the environments with drought and high temperature, S. grandis allocates more resources to sexual reproduction but reduces the investment in vegetative growth and asexual reproduction. Moreover, the amount of precipitation in April and May are significantly correlated with the sexual reproductive allocation of S. grandis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

4431-4435

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.A. Roff: The Evolution of Life Histories (Chapman and Hall, New York, USA 1992)

Google Scholar

[2] O. Ronce, S. Brachet, I. Olivieri, P.H. Gouyon, and J. Clobert: J. Ecol. Vol. 93 (2005), p.431

Google Scholar

[3] W.G. Abrahamson, in: Demography and evolution in plant populations, edited by O.T. Solbrig (Blackwell, Oxford 1980), p.89

Google Scholar

[4] S.N. Gardner and M. Mangel: Ecology. Vol. 80 (1999), p.1202

Google Scholar

[5] T. Maurice, G. Colling, S. Muller and D. Matthies: Plant Ecol. Vol. 213 (2012), p.831

Google Scholar

[6] T. Euler, J. Ågren and J. Ehrlén: Okios. Vol. 121 (2012), p.1400

Google Scholar

[7] J.P. Grime: Plant strategies and vegetation processes (Chichester: John Wiley and Sons 1979)

Google Scholar

[8] Y.F. Yang and L. Zhu: J. Integr. Plant Biol. Vol. 35 (1993), p.472 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar

[9] A.E. Villalobos and D.V. Peloz: J. Arid Environ. Vol. 49 (2001), p.321

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Han, Y.H. Wang, H. Jiang, M.L. Wang, H. Korpelaines and Ch.Y. Li: Plant Cell Environ. Vol. 36 (2013), p.356

Google Scholar

[11] C. Carlen, R. Kolliker and J. Nosberger: Oecologia. Vol. 121 (1999), p.441

Google Scholar

[12] J. Pumpanen, J. Heinonsalo, T. Rasilo, J. Villemot and H. Llvesniemi: Tree Physiol. Vol. 32(2012), p.724

Google Scholar

[13] Y.F. Yang, L.M. Yang and B.T. Zhang: Acta Phytoecol. Sinica. Vol. 25 (2001), p.337 (in Chinese)

Google Scholar