Differential Root Morphology between Metallicolous and Non-Metallicolous Populations of Rumex japonicus under Copper Stress

Article Preview

Abstract:

Two Rumex japonicus populations, one from copper (Cu) mine and the other from uncontaminated site, were studied for root morphology and biomass under Cu stress. Main root length and number of tips of the two populations were both significantly inhibited by Cu treatments. However, those of metallicolous population (MP) were higher than non-metallicolous population (NMP) under Cu stress. Cu treatments significantly inhibited root surface area in NMP while MP showed little difference from control. Cu treatments inhibited average root diameter and root/shoot ratio in NMP, but those in MP were significantly higher than control. Cu treatments significantly inhibited shoot biomass and root biomass in NMP. These results suggested that more assimilates allocated to root and the average root diameter increased under Cu stress to form a greater and stronger root might be partly reasons why R. japonicus can colonize the Cu enriched soils.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 726-731)

Pages:

81-84

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] N.A.L.M. Van Hoof, P.L.M. Koevoets, H.W.J. Hakvoort, W.M. Ten Bookum, H. Schat, J.A.C. Verkleij and W.H.O. Ernst: Physiol. Plant. Vol. 113 (2001), P. 225

DOI: 10.1007/0-306-47624-x_215

Google Scholar

[2] H. Schat, M. Llugany, R. Vooijs, J. Hartley-Whitaker and P.M. Bleeker: J. Exp. Bot. Vol. 53 (2002), P. 2381

Google Scholar

[3] J.A.C. Verkleij, P.L.M. Koevoets, M.A. Mechteld, M.M.A. Blake-Kalff and A.N. Chardonnens: J. Plant Physiol. Vol. 153 (1998), P. 188

Google Scholar

[4] D.A. Wilkins: Nature Vol. 180 (1957), P. 37

Google Scholar

[5] M.N.V. Prasad: Heavy Metal Stress in Plant (Springer Publications, Heidelberg 2004).

Google Scholar

[6] M.D. Vazquez, C. Poschenrieder and Y. Barceld: New Phytol. Vol. 120 (1992), P. 215

Google Scholar

[7] B. Gunse, C.H. Poschenrieder and J. Barcelo: Plant Physiol. Vol. 113 (1997), P. 595

Google Scholar

[8] P.W. Barlow and J.S. Parker: Plant Soil Vol. 187 (1996), P. 23

Google Scholar

[9] J.F. Farrar and D.L. Jones: New Phytol. Vol. 147 (2000), P. 43

Google Scholar