Thermodynamic Analysis of a R32/CO2 Cascade Refrigeration Cycle

Article Preview

Abstract:

A R32/CO2 cascade refrigeration cycle was analyzed thermodynamically, the results show that: Under given working conditions, there exists the best condensing temperature of the low-temperature circuit to make the maximum COP of the cycle. The lower evaporating temperature is, the lower the best condensing temperature of the low-temperature circuit is. Under the same evaporating temperature, COP increases and mH/mL decreases along with condensing temperature decreasing, under the same condensing temperature, COP decreases and mH/mL increases along with condensing temperature decreasing. To reduce the temperature difference in the cascade-condenser can increase COP and decrease mH/mL.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 732-733)

Pages:

527-530

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Giovanni Di Nicola, Giuliano Giuliani, and Fabio Polonara, et al: International Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 28, issue 2, 130-140, (2005)

Google Scholar

[2] J. Alberto Dopazo, Jose Fernandez-Seara, and Jaime Sieres: Applied Thermal Engineering, 1-7, (2008)

Google Scholar

[3] Getu H M and Bansal P K: International journal of refrigeration, Vol. 31, issue 1, 45-54, (2008)

Google Scholar

[4] Yanhua Lai, Zhen Dong, and Changbo Shao, et al: Journal of Shandong University(Engineering Science), Vol. 41, issue 2, 149-153, 2011, In Chinese

Google Scholar

[5] Rongshui Rao: Refrigeration and air-conditioning, Vol. 10, issue 3, 79-84, 2010, In Chinese

Google Scholar

[6] Chuanghui Lin: Refrigeration, Vol. 30, issue 3, 1-5, 2011, In Chinese

Google Scholar

[7] Lin Shi, and Mingshan Zhu: Journal of Refrigeration, Vol. 31, issue 1, 1-5, 2010, In Chinese

Google Scholar

[8] Tzong-Shing Lee, Cheng-Hao Liu, and Tung-Wei Chen: International Journal of Refrigeration, 1100-1108, (2006)

Google Scholar